______________________________________________________
Operation Disclosure Official
By Danlboon, Contributing Writer
Submitted on May 22, 2025
The courts have ruled many times for Qualified Immunity in violation of “acted in good faith” specified directly in Pierson v. Ray (1967) where maybe no one else has looked into it directly.
I am not a law student nor lawyer, but I was an aerospace and manufacturing inspector that even found numerous errors in the 2,500 page ‘Machinery’s Handbook’ while only looking at a few dozen pages.
Many law enforcement personnel receive Qualified Immunity only on the basis that they are in law enforcement regardless of the circumstances and the final outcome of the situation for their actions, including the passing away of someone due to their own negligence.
It is like they have the ultimate authority and We The People are to bow to EVERY Order they give us no matter what, and we are the ones at fault!
In Pierson v. Ray (1967), the Supreme Court first “justified qualified immunity as a means of protecting government defendants from financial burdens when acting in good faith in legally murky areas.”
“The common law has never granted police officers an absolute and unqualified immunity, and the officers in this case do not claim that they are entitled to one. Their claim is rather that they should not be liable if they acted in good faith and with probable cause in making an arrest under a statute that they believed to be valid. Under the prevailing view in this country a peace officer who arrests someone with probable cause is not liable for false arrest simply because the innocence of the suspect is later proved. Restatement, Second, Torts § 121 (1965); 1 Harper & James, The Law of Torts § 3.18, at 277—278 (1956); State of Missouri ex rel. and to Use of, Ward v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 179 F.2d 327 (C.A.8th Cir. 1950). A policeman’s lot is not so unhappy that he must choose between being charged with dereliction of duty if he does not arrest when he has probable cause, and being mulcted in damages if he does. Although the matter is not entirely free from doubt,10 the same consideration would seem to require excusing him from liability for acting under a statute that he reasonably believed to be valid but that was later held unconstitutional on its face or as applied.”
I would think that 100 % of all the cases for a lawsuit in favor of the government is to be looked at again if the government or law enforcement personnel won the case as if they “acted in good faith and with probable cause” was not brought up lawfully but just based they were the government.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
I would think many cases would be overturned if the law enforcement personnel have NOT “acted in good faith and with probable cause.”
I’ve seen in several videos that raids were at the wrong home and innocent people lost their lives due to government errors and the cases was tossed out due to the only words ‘Qualified Immunity’ and nothing of the circumstances happening.
Maybe the lawsuit amounts that were requested may have to be minimized, not a few thousand dollars, but not in the tens of millions either.
A couple cases were where several officers were on top of the defendant and they couldn’t breath and they just passed away and the officers did nothing to assist in their recovery, even for calling for medical care as they did not have the training so they backed off and waited solely on that basis.
It is also my opinion that if a ‘false arrest’ was made then the law enforcement personnel do have ‘Qualified Immunity’ per this case no matter what and that approves more ‘false arrests’ to be made.
This is like some recent videos I’ve seen where the 1st Amendment auditor asks the officer what the 1st Amendment says and the officer cannot answer and the person is arrested anyways.
It is like the officer has not even graduated from school as the schools don’t teach anything about the State’s and US Constitutions and our Rights.
Advertisement
______________________________________________________
Maybe with what I bring up today is that other people look into this and have SCOTUS overturn ALL cases that were in favor of the government and their personnel or just dismissed for the Qualified Immunity.
Or we can just go to our New Republic and this case no longer exists as it was after 1871.
https://dinarchronicles.com/tag/danlboon/
https://operationdisclosureofficial.com/tag/danlboon/
Danlboon
______________________________________________________
Contact Author
If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
______________________________________________________
Guest Posting
If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [voyagesoflight@gmail.com] applying these following rules.
The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”
– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________
Newsletter
If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________
Operation Disclosure is an independent media platform dedicated to exploring global geopolitics and alternative perspectives. Our mission is to provide a central hub for diverse viewpoints on world events, including independent research into exopolitics, aerial phenomena (UAP), and the historical origins of humanity. We believe in providing a platform for information that encourages deeper inquiry into the world around us.
Disclaimer: The content on Operation Disclosure—including articles, videos, and images—is contributed by our readers or curated for informational and educational interest. Views, opinions, and claims expressed in these posts belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Operation Disclosure. We do not guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of this content; therefore, we encourage all readers to engage with the material with a spirit of personal inquiry and discernment.
Copyright © Operation Disclosure Official
