(Reader: Doug Duff) How to Level the Playing Field

Reader Post | By Doug Duff

HOW TO LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD

Warning, WARNING, WARNING!!! This material is EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. This is NOT legal advice.

President Lincoln created a Trust to serve the Republic in 1860; this Trust was a corporation bearing original predicate power of which, if the controlling factors of modern government lost, they’d lose it all. Our actions and “movements” must be in this previously mentioned original authority (with the substance of gold and silver).

Many changes took place in the following years and changes are taking place today. The governmental “corporation” went bankrupt, was “reorganized,” and bankrupted several times more. The “receivership” went to the underwriters of the bankruptcy – the banks. Those “banks” were what we refer today as “world banks.”

Of the many changes that took place the most pronounced and visible is the Abrogation of the Gold Clause in 1933 along with other major changes made by the F.D.R. “empire.”

We find the term “jurisdiction” actually means Oath Spoken; Oath means Law; and Law is linked with True Money, which is gold and silver. Gold was removed from common circulation, then in the 1960’s silver was removed from common circulation. Remember what was just said that Oath equals Law, Law equals True Money, and True Money equals gold and silver, thus – no “jurisdiction.” Now, I’ll make a statement that we’ll have to explain later in this article – “the only jurisdiction available today is linked (equal) to original predicate power. The only means of access to the original predicate power is through the True Creditor, the actual “donor” of the substance (labor) that all material goods (which can be exchanged with gold and silver) are linked (tied) to.”

Remember, it was F.D.R. that “pledged” our “labor” in exchange for fiat currency. The only problem is it wasn’t his to pledge. He could only pledge for the corporation and it was the corporation that went into receivership (bankruptcy), not the people, nor the Republic, nor the original predicate power. F.D.R. committed the largest crime that has occurred since the crucifixion of Immanuel, our Redeemer. Well, the size of the crime is right up there with the “uncivil” war where 250,000 brothers k----d each other because one World Bank financed both sides to weaken and destroy a True Republic.

O.K., I’ll give a short explanation of that last sentence; the Bank of England financed the North; the Bank of France financed the South. Both were Rothschild Banks. Yes, they accomplished their goal (another word for “goal” is jail).

Now, we move ahead to the adaptation of Rule 65.1 which took effect on February 28, 1966, effectively dominant July 1, 1966, which coincides with the changes in Admiralty Law that took over the federal rules. Admiralty and Maritime Claims are any claim of debt involving “money” which require or permit the giving of security by a party in the form of a bond (promise) or stipulation (contract) or other undertaking which automatically submits to the jurisdiction of the military court and (under such jurisdiction) irrevocably appoints the clerk of the court as surety’s agent upon whom any papers affecting the surety’s liability on the bond or undertaking may be served. The surety’s liability may be enforced on motion* without the necessity of an independent action. The motion and such notice of the motion as the court prescribes may be served on the clerk of the court, who shall forthwith mail copies to the sureties if their addresses are known.

[*A “motion” is an application to the court made by the prosecutor or defense attorney, requesting that the court make a decision on a certain issue before the trial begins. The motion can affect the trial, courtroom, defendants, evidence, or testimony. Only judges decide the outcome of motions.]

This “setting of the stage” brings us to an important set of events that effectively will liberate the common man from the corporate bondage inflicted upon us. It is a process that will make the snakes hide in their dens. Some of you know what I’m talking about; those snakes file their fangs before they crawl out of their hole every morning and put on that effeminate black “gown” to begin their hissing.

Here is the “process” I was talking about; you place a “distress” on his/her bond, oath, or undertaking and tell the Clerk of the Court to notify all contingent parties (with addresses) that there is an attachment of his properties against your claim for his breach.

I have previously accepted his Oath of Office and I have accepted his proper assignment as Judge and/or Magistrate and I have accepted the Official Charter of The STATE OF MISSOURI held by Secretary Of State for the Federal Government as a firm and binding offer to contract along with any undertaking and stipulation he may make as I am now bonding him and effectively remove all liability away from him as an act of subrogation. I JUST BECAME HIS SURETY. That means I can attach everything that is attached to his signature and the Clerk of the Court is going to do it for me.

At this point I’ll type up a sample request of distress for compliance:

Secretary of State, United States, Antony J. Blinken. Request for administrative review, notice of claim in the nature of distress, request for order reference case number __________, US District Court, Missouri.

This request is an inclusion of a Cross-Claim against officers; in particular, ______, ________, and _______ and all other agents and representatives up scaling from said agents/officers, all-inclusive, to Governor ______ of the STATE OF MISSOURI.

I, the above identified, am a Citizen of Missouri Republic and, thereby, an American Citizen, being owed the legal protections defined and mandated under the federal constitution. I have been denied these protections and have been forced by intimidation and coercion under the guise of the legal process to seek federal intervention via the United States District court filing, case number ___________, and filed (date). Certified mail has been posted to defendant’s attorneys and the Attorney General for State of Missouri, numbers ________. We have requested that the office of the Secretary of State for the United States as holder of the charter for Missouri State reviews these matters post haste. Any records we hold will be forwarded upon request. These records verify our court claims. Please place a distress in the suit amount of one hundred million dollars against the accounts of State of Missouri with appropriate agencies. It is believed that no harm will accrue if the State of Missouri is able to disclose “no fowl,” which the record indicated they could not. It is also requested that as holder of the State of Missouri charter, that your office issue an order to disclose their powers as we requested. We find it very sad that this letter needs to be written at all. We also find it disturbing that in order to gain the legal protections boasted of by the states we are forced to seek federal intervention. It would appear that your charter holders’ actions are not justified when the complete record is reviewed which we have just done. The suit was set up with a jurisdictional statement as follows:

Plaintiff (in Cross-Complaint) is a Citizen of the State of Missouri; defendant is the STATE OF MISSOURI and is incorporated under the laws of the United States having their principle place of business in the State of Missouri. Agents for defendant are X, Y, and Z and act in their official capacities for the state defendant STATE OF MISSOURI. This action arises under the Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 10: Amendments to the Constitution, 14, 5, 6, 4, and 9. The amount of controversy sees exclusive interest and cost the sum of one hundred million dollars. The action also arises under 42 USC 1986, 85, and 83 as others more fully appear, here and after. The issue is the State of Missouri and the STATE OF MISSOURI are not the same legal entities. The state statutes of every state during 1933 and 1934 validate that fact. They (the 1933 and 1934 statutes) inform us that all of the new statutes are inferior to the old statutes; all Real Law is found in the old statutes. This is further proven through careful study of the State Compact Act.

No account of record under state statutes or the Supreme Court has ever validated to me that any “magistrate” judge is authorized to give his interpretation of statutory law. They authorize him to apply the law. This is true administration under a maritime contract brought forward by way of a bond, which is required.

The federal franchise created in 1933 or 1934 under the State Compact Act is a commercial operation, that of selling the “service of government.” Because all law is contract and all law is commerce I am not able to “argue” with what the magistrate says; I can only believe he is telling the truth; therefore, I accept everything he says at value and, I, being the True Creditor in Fact, bond him for indemnity that he told the truth by accepting his “offer to contract” (Oath of Office) to consummate the contract and make this distress on his bond due to his lie and usurpation of authority where none existed.

The “distress” is an invocation of the concept of an insurance company, the bonds, or the sureties, reviewing the actions of their underlings and their agents. That’s why the letter is sent to Antony J. Blinken. He’s the Holder in Due Course. The owner is the Federal Reserve and this document is our liable notice that we have enjoiner in this case.

The Federal Reserve issues private money. The Treasury guarantees that they can do that under a contract called the Federal Reserve Act, which is an insurance policy on the stability of the US dollar.

O.K., now the question comes up, “How do I enforce any non-court court action?” The answer is quite simple, you don’t. The Clerk of the Court does that. The Clerk is the only one in the court that has any power. He has the “seal.” The judge’s signature isn’t good enough; he has to be bonded with the mark of authority – the seal. The Clerk becomes the bonding agent. We are issuing a superior bond because we are the Creditors. We indemnify their bonds.

Remember, when there is no “record” there is no court; the Clerk of the Court is the most important person in the whole operation. The Clerk “certifies” the actions of the actors. The Clerk validates (for example) that (under Federal Rule 8(d)) the defendant did not answer; and that, (under Rule 52) the judge denied the motions and the summary judgement based on a default without findings of fact and conclusions of law (under Rule 52). The Clerk is the holder of the seal and certifies the record to qualify as “full faith and credit.” However, an order signed by a judge without the Clerk’s seal does not qualify as full faith and credit. The Record shows that the judge did not answer according to the Rules. This is all stipulated under seal.

You can rightly inform him that a criminal complaint will be filed against him with the Attorney General of the United States and the Attorney General of the state that he operates for under the seal of the Clerk of the Court (who is superior in matters of record), the sole (exclusive) keeper of the record.

Rule 8(d) is the same in every state; it is very clear; “Effect of Failure To Deny. Averments in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is required, other than those as to the amount of damage, are admitted when not denied in the responsive pleading. Averments in a pleading to which no responsive pleading is required or permitted shall be taken as denied or avoided.”

Then, Rule 52 says, “Findings by the Court; Judgment on Partial Findings. In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon, and judgment shall be entered pursuant to Rule 58;” that’s the Clerk that enters the judgement, not the judge. The Clerk is empowered to issue judgements. It is true that the court appoints the Clerk, but the Clerk serves the Executive function. The judicial is not in control of the records.

There is no judicial determination; it is a determination of fact made by the Clerk. Any issue is not between me and the judge; it is between me and the Clerk. The Clerk’s records are either accurate, or they are not. That’s what his bond is for, accurate records.

It is the Clerk of the Court that issues a Writ of Execution and Attachment, which when executed by the Sheriff delivers the judges’ (or, other opponents) possessions into your hands. A certified copy of the court proceedings is normally all you need to default the judge for Trespass on the Case because (according to the record) he made a ruling on no evidence. It (the record) shows whether testimony or evidence was ever given, or NOT.

Here’s another example; if the record shows that the complaint had no verified assessment, the Clerk makes the determination that a federal grand jury cannot sit.

Then, we come to the default rule; it’s FRCP Rule 56(a). The Rules and state statutes state that you can proceed non-judicially on any collection action where there is a certified document by a state officer.

Now, to go farther (in a different direction) you can obtain jurisdiction (and ownership) over your own agent (person, your ALL CAPS NAME) to make “appearances” on your behalf in the commercial realm. In the process, utilize the UCC 1 to its fullest advantage.

You can surrender a copy of your “birth certificate” and create another all capitals entity with a new TIN number (an LLC), bond that entity in silver coin (my opinion, one silver dollar will do), and have him/it (the new entity) issue an indemnity bond. His/its’ sole function is to be a transmitting utility between me and them.

You can even “pull their charter.” There’s a buyout clause and a breach clause in the original agreement in 1909 (relating to the Federal Reserve Act) in the Congressional records for two hundred and forty million dollars. You need to accept their charter as well as their Oaths.

Through their (the courts) negligence and usurpation of authority that does not exist the courts have placed the entire economic system of the free world at risk because all trade (in the free world) is tied together using the US dollar and has been since 1944, Bretton Woods, New Jersey, agreement. The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) would be rather upset if news of such dereliction (of the courts) reached them.

The Federal Rules apply to many cases with limitations attached. Rule 81 tells us what we can do and why. In Rule 81 you’ll find that Title 10, USC 7651 to 7681 do not apply to mental health proceedings in District of Columbia. These rules are applicable to proceedings for admission to citizenship, habeas corpus, and quo warranto. Citizenship is a political issue* with no court in the country being able to make a political statement. Habeas Corpus is for your labor. Quo Warranto is demand to see their authority to steal it. [*Political Issue means they cannot obtain political jurisdiction over you.]

It all evolves around “involuntary servitude,” the stealing of our energy. Kozminski 489 US 1988 is an involuntary servitude case and it states that no one can be subject to the legal process as servitude. Remember, Habeas Corpus is a direct link to our LABOR; and labor is commerce; and who can enter commerce? Answer – only a commercial entity can enter commerce, namely – our (their) ALL CAPS “person.” Our search for Identity Theft is over. So, let’s put it together; the Writ of Habeas Corpus, or order to show cause, shall be directed to the person having custody of the person detained. And, who’s detaining the all caps person legal entity? Answer, – whoever holds the Certificate of Berth!! [Berth, not a mis-spell.] I believe you’ll find the “Birth Certificate” of every child birthed in the free world at the “Tower Of Power” located at 55 Water Street, just down from the Federal Reserve Building in New York City who, also, operates as “CEDE & CO.” To the best of my knowledge that is a legal entity licensed under Washington, District of Columbia, and related to the International Monetary Fund.

Here’s where form 95 comes in; it’s a claim for (the fruits of) your labor, the highest form of lien that exists. The only value they took was your labor. The “court” cannot make any political statement for you, but they have to give you your political rights. The Clerk of the Court is the processing agent for form 95 because it’s a political issue and you’ve just made a political statement. I “reside” in the Republic and the entity I just created resides there, too.

I believe that form 95 and the APPLICATION FOR THE RELEASE OF BLOCKED FUNDS, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (form has no form number, strange, huh), together with a Writ of Habeas Corpus is the “avenue” you must access to obtain the original bond of “your” Birth Certificate. I am also of the persuasion that the value of said “entity” is near one billion USD in cash and currency.

Proper demand must be made and a settlement should be negotiated within 3 days unless for good cause shown additional time is allowed in which cases brought under 28 USC 2254 shall not exceed 40 days and all other cases shall not exceed 20 days. 2254 deals with state cases.

Closure Statement: I am NOT able to answer any questions concerning this document. Yes, I put it together from data collected and researched over many years. It is only a tool in the hands of a craftsman. If you are not “crafted” – don’t try anything s----d. However, if you wish to promote the security of our Nation, do what you will. Everything “they” do against us is at their own peril. Beware, you wield a two-edged sword. It cuts both ways.

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [voyagesoflight@gmail.com] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Operation Disclosure is an independent media platform dedicated to exploring global geopolitics and alternative perspectives. Our mission is to provide a central hub for diverse viewpoints on world events, including independent research into exopolitics, aerial phenomena (UAP), and the historical origins of humanity. We believe in providing a platform for information that encourages deeper inquiry into the world around us.

Disclaimer: The content on Operation Disclosure—including articles, videos, and images—is contributed by our readers or curated for informational and educational interest. Views, opinions, and claims expressed in these posts belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Operation Disclosure. We do not guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of this content; therefore, we encourage all readers to engage with the material with a spirit of personal inquiry and discernment.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure Official