(Reader: Doug Duff) Interlocking Directorates – Mistakes are Free


Reader Post | By Doug Duff

to establish parameters of fiduciaries

The U.S. Feral Government (not a typo) is out of control!!

Thomas Jefferson said in 1821:  “The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body – working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”

President Theodore Roosevelt 1906: “Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.”

President Woodrow Wilson: “Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

President Rutherford B. Hayes said, “This is a government of the people, by the people and for the people NO LONGER. It is a government of corporations, by corporations, and for corporations.”

President Harry S. Truman said, “Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.”



I placed the above 5 statements (by very important men) to get your attention and show “WHY” this is important. Next, you’ll discover “HOW” it all came about.

Before we go further, let me explain why “legalese” is so confusing.  An objective method of measuring the readability of English text is known as the “Flesch Index.” This measures the level of understanding necessary for an individual to comprehend the written English language. Newspapers are written at an average comprehension level of 7. The average high school graduate reads and understands at a level of 10. The average law school graduate reads and comprehends at a level of 15. The Internal Revenue Code ranks on this index at an average level of 31, with some specific provisions as high as 55. And the words that are used in the law have specific legal definitions that are different from the common English definitions. Since the laws that we are supposed to obey are written at a level that an individual of reasonable intelligence cannot understand, then perhaps we should be highly suspect of the law writer’s motives. By making the law so difficult to comprehend, Congress has effectively removed our access to Justice and Equality under the Law.

Then, to add insult to injury, “they” have placed a “cloak of immunity” around themselves and made it impossible to “win” in their courtrooms:

“Prosecutors may knowingly file charges against innocent persons for a crime that never occurred.” Tenth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals in Norton v. Liddell, 620 F.2d 1375 (1980).

“Prosecutors are immune from lawsuit for conspiring with judges to determine outcome of judicial proceedings.” Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals in Asheman v. Pope, 793 E.2d 1072 (1986).

“Although we know that Maggio cannot comply with the order, we must keep a straight face and pretend that he can, and must thus affirm orders which first direct Maggio to do an impossibility, and then punish him for refusal to perform it.” Maggio v. Zeitz333 U.S. 56 (1948)


Legalese,” word-smithing, and spin-doctoring are terms and phrases utilized almost exclusively by the legal industries to isolate their “craft” from their unsuspecting “hosts” much like a leach or mosquito will, at first, inject an agent into their “victim” to deaden any pain and avoid detection of their parasitic actions.

Now, let’s proceed:

Understand that the “Highest” form of law is NOT Statutory Law, but it is Contract Law. Follow this thought by knowing that EVERY law has (at least) two (2) sides to it. There is Public Law and there is Private Law. Confusing? Yes, so follow closely. Commercial Law is “Private Law.” Yes, Commercial Law does involve you.

And, keep in mind that: “It is well settled that “United States” et al is a corporation, originally incorporated February 21, 1871, under the name “District of Columbia””. 16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62

For sake of simplicity, a “Public Law”, as referenced, P.L. 88-244 (below), is Private Law only meant for private corporate citizens, not We The People.

1. The first “connection” from the highest, and most potent, position is:

a. 77 Stat. 630-631, P.L. 88-243 (1963) and P.L. 88-244 (1963) introduces and “makes law” providing the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as Private Law enacted for the municipal District of Columbia and the United States (federal government). These laws/actions were/are expressly in force and effect on citizens of the federal government. PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630 is AN ACT To enact the Uniform Commercial Code for the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.” This is where the uniform commercial code enters as the implied “law of the land.” [SEE also, H.J. Res 778, December 10, 1963, 77 Stat 775]

(i) “A private law is one which is confined to particular individuals, associations, or corporations”: 50 AmJur 12, p.28

(ii) A private law can be enforced by a court of competent jurisdiction when statutes for its enforcement are enacted: 20 AmJur 33, pgs. 58, 59.

(iii) Statutes creating corporations are private acts: 20 AmJur 35, p. 60.


 (iv) In this connection, the Federal Reserve Act is private law. Federal Reserve banks derive their existence and corporate power from the Federal Reserve Act: Armano v. Federal Reserve Bank 468 F.Supp 674 (1979).

(v) The distinction between public and private acts is not always sharply defined when published statutes are printed in their final form: Case v. Kelly 133 U.S. 21 (1890).

b. It is all private law, not International law (but, may be referred to as Private International Law)and it is owned by the same people that own public law 88-243 (1968). The UCC was written and is owned by UNIDROIT. It is in the Vatican (actually, it is only about one hundred yards from the “Holy See”).

(i) To properly address “public law”, one must understand that it is “Private Corporate Charter” that owns the “P.L.” and it is all “statutory”. Public Law was converted to Public Policy in 1938 (policy = political = police). All private corporations, including governments, are under “public policy” and are to deal only with other corporations, as exemplified herein.

(ii) The Private Rights ofPrivate Man is not affected by public law, public policy, private law, or anything else, as long as, Private Man does not harm another Private Man. He is not “statutory”, but Lawful.

A. “We the people have discharged any debt which may be said to exist or owed to the state/government.    The governments are, presumably, indebted continually to the people, because the people [the sovereigns] presumably assented to the 1878 creation of the government corporation and because we suffer its continued existence.    The continued debt owed to the people is discharged only as it continues not to violate our private rights, and when government fails in its duty to provide protection-discharge its debt to the people, it is an abandonment [delictual fault] of any and all power, authority or vestige of sovereignty which it may have otherwise possessed, and the laws remain the same, the sovereignty reverting to the people whence it came.” Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).

B. “All that government does and provides legitimately is in pursuit of its duty to provide protection for private rights Wynhammer v. People, (13 NY 378), which duty is a debt owed to its creator, WE THE PEOPLE and the private unenfranchised individual; which debt and duty is never extinguished nor discharged, and is perpetual.    No matter what the de facto government/state provides for us in manner of convenience and safety, the unenfranchised individual owes nothing to the government.” (Emphasis mine) Hale v. Henkel201 U.S. 43.

(iii) Public means: of, concerning, or affecting the common unity of the people, the Assemblage of Private Man.

(iv) Private means: not available for public use, control, or participation, belonging to a particular person or persons, as opposed to the public or the government (remember, as a corporation, the gubm’t becomes no more than any other corporate “person”), not holding an official or public position.  – If you’re still confused, go back to 1. b. above and 2. & 4.e. below.

(v) “The entire taxing and monetary systems are, hereby, placed under the U.C.C.” The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, also see: Public Law 89-719, Legis. Hist., pg 3722, C.R.S. 5-1-106.    
[“The Federal    Tax Lien    Act of 1966, Pub. Law 89-719, Section 101, 80 Stat. 1125 (1966) was adopted in order to conform the lien provisions of the internal revenue laws to the concepts developed in the Uniform Commercial Code.“]


Now, special attention must be given to a tiny section of the U.C.C. Please identify the “Debtor” of all commercial transactions and tell me where the Debtor is located. All right, I will, copied EXACTLY as found in the U.C.C.:

(h) [Location of United States.]
The United States is located in the District of Columbia.

(vi) NOTE: Concerning “private” v. “public” via “Civil” Law – The civil law tradition makes a sharp distinction between private and public law. Private law includes the rules governing civil and commercial relationships such as marriage, divorce, and contractual agreements. Public law consists of matters that concern the government: constitutional law, criminal law, and administrative law. In many countries with civil law systems, two sets of courts exist—those that hear public law cases and those that address matters of private law. Remember, Civil Law is opposed to Common Law.

c. The U.S. pays $260,000 per year to UNIDROIT for the use of the copyrighted UCC. The International Registry is the private law of UNIDROIT.

d. The Vatican Bank had owned Continental Bank, Chicago, whose sole stockholder was Walter Commings, Jr, the Chief Judge of 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

e. Chicago Board of Trade is owned by a Judge.

f. All courts in the United States (corporate zone) are “for profit” corporations and listed in Dunn and Bradstreet under the heading, “Also Trades As:”

(i) There is no debate that the free States of the Union once existed upon North American soil. There is no debate that the People obtained the Rights of the King as Sovereigns and Joint Tenants in the Sovereignty. There is no debate that said States of the Union, if extant, are well hidden and non-accessible and the Sovereign People are now draped with a blackened cloak of deceit, trickery, and true identity theft by those known as “persons” of corporate nature, legal fictions, creatures of pretense in mind only.

(ii) How do “they” turn a bona-fide Republic State of the Union back into a “territory” of the United States?

(A) On the political “side“, this is how, “…on the authority of the United States Supreme Court, it is the complete subjugation [to bring under control; conquer; to make subservient; enslave] of any political unit to the federal government of the United States that makes a subdivision a territory”. Binns v. United States, 194 U.S. 486; also The Coquitlam v. United States, 163 U.S. 346. [Boys and girls, can we all say U.S.D.C.? By the way, you should learn the difference between U.S.D.C. (United States District Court) and D.C.U.S. (District Court of the United States). There’s a vast difference.]


Under the “Buck Act,” 4 U.S.C Secs. 105-113, the federal government has created a “Federal area” within the boundaries of the several states. This area is similar to any territory that the federal government acquires through purchase, conquest or treaty, thereby imposing federal territorial law upon the people in this Federal area,” and in Sec. 110(d): The term “State” includes any territory or possession of the United States.   The Buck act affects the actions of all federal departments within the 50 states. There in 4 U.S.C. Sections 105, the federal “State” is defined “(also known as), “The State of xxxxxxx.” 

The Supreme Court says, “There has been created a fictional federal “State (of)   [name of state]   within a state.”    We have numerous references to this.

   Howard v. Sinking Fund of Louisville, 344 U.S. 624, 73 S.Ct. 465, 476, 97 L.Ed. 617 (1953); Schwarts v. O’Hara TP School District, 100 A 2d. 621, 625, 375, Pa. 440

Yes, the United States is a Corporation [See 28 U.S.C. § 30020(15)].  The States are sub-corporations of the Fed, this aforementioned Corporation.  [See 1934, State Compact Act; Buck Act, 4 U.S.C. § 101].

[Primary laws extended to Territories] by the United States was the Customs Act of July 27, 1868 [15 Stat.L. 240; Rev. Stat. of 1873-1874, 2nd ed. Secs. 1954-1976, page 342], extending over the Territory the laws of the United States with reference to customs, commerce and navigation, and constituting it a customs collection district.  Under this act important powers of regulation were conferred upon the Secretary of the Treasury.

There is guilt of tort and the breaching of contracts against Common Man under fictional falsity propagated by legal process to Real and Common Man causing great pain and injury.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to relief is “entitled to free access….. to its judicial tribunals and public offices in every State in the Union” (2 Black 620; see also: Crandell vs. Nevada, 6 Wall 35). Plaintiff should not be charged fees or costs for the lawful and constitutional right to petition this court in this matter in which he is entitled to relief, as it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for fictions and subjects of government, and should not be applied to the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief (Hale vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43).

“The Fee is the statutory creature moving within the fictional falsity as if it is presumed to be standing as the amortized obligation“. Ryan v Motor Credit Company, 130 J.J. Eq. 531, 23 A.2d 607, 621

This is the fiction of law, wherein the fictional falsities are perfected by devious means. Read Ballentine’s Law Dictionary.

Fiction. Something is presumed to be true, which is false.


The alleged determination of “commitment cost” of $ _____________ for alleged (traffic tickets) or court costs, fees, or penalties requires execution as a cloak to disguise a collateral undertaking” in U.S. Funds and is malicious vexation by legal process under the disguise/pretense of a “lawful” government to enforce the unwritten Master – Slave relationship.

“Although probable cause may not be inferred from malice, malice may be inferred from lack of probable cause.” Pauley v. Hall 335 N. W. 2d 197, 124 Mich App 255. 

“Malice is a state of mind and an essential element of action for malicious prosecution and is to be found by jury from case, and want of probable cause is the other element of action for malicious prosecution which must be proved by plaintiff.” Lopez v. Modisitt 488 F. Supp 119 D. C. 1980.

(B) On the religious “side”, this is how, “EXECUTIVE ORDER 13397 – Church as a Governmental Agency”

Gone with the stroke of a pen, as of Mach 07, 2006, the Department of Homeland Security will now utilize our nations non-profit churches as one of the federal government’s primary spying agencies. Is any further comment necessary?

(C) But, how can “they” have access to our everyday functions to obtain control over the innocent maneuvers we must negotiate daily?

“But, in fact and in law, such statutes are intended to be applied to those who are here as “residents” in this State under the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution and the so-called Fourteenth Amendment.” United States v United Mine Workers of America, (1947) 67 S.Ct. 677, 686, 330 U.S. 258.

22 USC Sec. 1621 -EXPCITE- TITLE 22 CHAPTER 21 SUBCHAPTER I -HEAD- Sec. 1621. Definitions

-STATUTE- For the purposes of this subchapter – (a) The term ‘person’ shall include an individual, partnership, corporation, or the Government of the United States.

Clarity must be brought to the subject of “State.” A vast difference exists between a fiction, fable, legal entity, corporation of “some body politic” and the non-fiction, real and true, body of Christians also known as a “state.” The following is placed directly below to bring clarity to such:


The State is a person, and possesses as its property one territory. As this one civil person consists of all the citizens, so its property consists of all the individual property of the citizens. It is una persona, unicum patrimonium. This unity of the person and property of the state is expressed by the Common Law maxim, that all lands were originally granted out by the sovereign [Yahweh, God, our Father, through His Son, Yahshua, the Christ], and are therefore holden, either mediately or immediatelyin fee. In apprehension of [Christian and Biblical] law, the [Christian] state holds the soil of the whole territory as one estate [in Christ].

(D) And, aren’t “they”, the feral government, in reality “NON EXISTANT”?

Absolutely, so, let’s look at United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33. – “It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent.    H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.”…

(E) How is the “United States” usurping their “alleged” authority?

In “the Court’s” “Statement of Venue” (scilicet, ss) you may find written or indicated that your “Plaintiff” is the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.  Though this may appear that this may be an attempt to identify The United States of America, it is fatally flawed and is, in nature, fact, and law, an attempted enlargement, by means of fictions, of your non-existent granted powers and authorities.  In a landmark, time honored, never disputed, and still distinguished case we learn:

“The proper jurisdiction of the courts of Common Law is of things done within the bodies of counties, and its further enlargements, by means of fictions, can be considered only as ingenious subterfuges and devices, to amplify their powers.”

Justice Story; 1815 De Lovio vs. Boit, 2 Gall. 398; 7 Fed. Cas. 418; Case No. 1,776 (Reaffirmed 78 U.S. 1 to 396 U.S. 215).

We are bringing to your attention, at this time, the second part of this indisputable political doctrine.  In order to clarify this statement, we have taken the liberty of noticing synonyms to those words that may not be easily understood:

(Common-Language Clarification) “and its further enlargements (expansions), by means of fictions (imaginary/legal assumptions), can be considered only as ingenious (clever) subterfuges (concealments) and devices (schemes), to amplify (exaggerate) their powers.”

(iii) Whoever said the “police” are there to protect and to serve? I said that; they’re here to protect the political establishment from knowledgeable people and to “serve” the public in the same way that a farmer gets his cow “serviced” to produce another calf. Are “they” managing the herd? You bet they are.

23 CFR PART 1250 – 40% TO


40% Benefit to Local-Reg

Part 1250 gives 40 percent benefit to local police action through political subdivision participation in State highway safety programs under 23 U.S.C. 402 (b)(1)(C). 1250.4(b) When Federal funds apportioned under 23 U.S.C. 402 are expended by a political subdivision, such expenditures are clearly part of the local share. [Note: previous to this it was stated that the Federal funds dispersed are at least 40%.] Well, so much for “un-biased” police.

(iv) The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties; it tells the state to let people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order.” Bowers v Devito, 686 F2d 616.

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Al.:  373 US 262 (1962):

If the state does convert your right into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it, you can ignore the license and a fee and engage the right with impunity.”

Wright v. Georgia 373 US 284 (1964):

“Failure  to  obey  the  command  of  a  police  officer  constitutes  a traditional  form of breach of the peace. Obviously, however, one cannot be punished for failing to obey the command of an officer if the command itself is violative of the constitution.” 

g. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)

h. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493).

i. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493).

j. The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44).

k. America is a British Colony. (the UNITED STATES is a CORPORATION, not a land mass, and it existed before the revolutionary war and the British troops did not leave until 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. v. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.). Also, see Order 1778 signed by Queen Elizabeth and Her Privy Councel, 1997.

28 USC 3002(15)(A): “United States” means a Federal corporation.

l. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213). The “United States” or District of Columbia is owned by the Vatican Bank, lock stock and barrel, according to Tupper Saussey’s archival research.

m. 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209); see also Public Law 88-243 and 88-244 (December 1963).

n. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80). Actually, it was the Rothschild banks – the Rothschild banks of England financed the North, – the Rothschild banks of France financed the South. At that time, the King of England was also the King of France.

o. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that “New York City was the capital of the World” and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)).

p. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816).

SEE: Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America Regarding The Headquarters Of the United Nations, Section 7(d) & (8), 22 U.S.C.A 287 (1979 Ed.) at pg. 241). It is to be further observed that the “Agreement” regarding the Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional Record – Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond), and is illegally in the Country in the first instant.

q. The IRS is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) not the U.S. Government. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.). See also: Bretton Woods Agreement, as amended.

r. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government, even though the “US Government” held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang, 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d 1239) [“They are also corporations.]

s. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2)).

t. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF, which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.)

u. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.).

v. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826)

w. The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654).

x. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)

y. There are no Judicial courts in America and there have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178).

(i) And, do the “courts” enforce laws, or codes? Answer: Code is supreme. “Where both the code and general principles are available, the former should always be considered and applied if applicable.  By legislative declaration the code is the law, and if general principles appear inconsistent, they must be considered displaced under AS 45.05.006.  Moreover, even where inconsistency does not exist, the code must be regarded as supreme; general principles even when consistent with the code are merely supplementary“. Prince v. LeVan, 486 P.2d 959, 9 UCC Rep.Serv. 367 (1971).  Kelly v. Miller, 575 P.2d 1221, 23 UCC Rep.Serv. 632 (1978)

(ii) But, are “judicial” courts necessary? Answer: The particular need for making the judiciary independent was elaborately pointed out by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist, No. 78, from which we excerpt the following:

“The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The Legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The Judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment.” WE HAVE NOT HAD THIS BALANCE OF POWER FOR A VERY LONG TIME!!

(iii) The “ideal” of checks and balances within government structure have long been a thing of the past.

The Reconstruction Acts took away the Lawful Standing, the Lawful Capacity, from the Citizens and changed their Lawful Standing to “Legal Status”, from ELECTORS in a THREE BRANCH GOVERNMENT as they were in Original Jurisdiction, to REGISTERED VOTERS in a TWO BRANCH GOVERNMENT.

Want proof? Go to your local City Clerk and ask for a CERTIFIED COPY of your City Charter in any State, or your local County Clerk for a CERTIFIED COPY of your County Charter in any State. You will discover that ALL cities and counties in your State have only two branches, the Executive and Legislative. There is no Judicial Branch!! The Judicial Districts were all abolished in 1856 by the Act of the 34th Congress.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1860, reviewing the Act of the 34th Congress, ordered ALL the States in existence at that time to close down all the Court’s of law and all courts complied in 1860. None of the Court’s of any State are created by the Constitution of their State.

Every Court, from top to bottom, the justice of the peace courts, the police courts, the municipal courts, the district courts and the circuit courts are ALL Statutory Courts created by Statutes which were enacted by the Legislature and in fact, and law, merely Administrative Agencies and only have the authority conferred by Statute.

z. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178).

(i) Modes of enforcement are erratic and arbitrary, a ground for prosecution is anybody’s guess, and the operation in the law is shrouded in mystery. In most any issue at hand we might suggest the following:

“This ordinance is void for vagueness, both in the sense that it “fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute,” United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617, and because it encourages arbitrary and erratic arrests and convictionsThornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88; Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S. 242.”

When this court found that the Internal Revenue agents had violated the law and that the improperly seized records were to be returned, the agents were, to say the least, not happy.  More than once have judges of a court been indirectly reminded that they too are taxpayers.

No sophisticated person is unaware that even in this commonwealth the Internal Revenue Service has been in possession of facts with respect to public officials which it has presented or shelved in order to serve what can only be called political ends, be they high or low.  And a judge who knows the score is aware that every time his decisions offend the Internal Revenue Service, he is inviting a close inspection of his returns.Lord v. Kelley, 240 F.Supp. 167 (1965).

(ii) Dear Friends: this all leads to domestic terrorism! Please follow:

18 USC 2331. – Definitions. As used in this chapter –

(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that –

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended –

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

aa. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502).

bb. We (as corporate entities) own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten, 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481).

cc. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037).

dd. You (as corporate entities) can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of City of Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520) That’s why I rely on YOUR sworn Oath to keep my Rights as “secured by the Constitution”.

ee. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.

However, please be mindful that, it is not until you get to Article 10 (PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630) – Construction with other laws that you begin to see that the laws of the Republic were left in place in Section 28:10-104; Laws not repealed. And, remember, in UCC 1-103.6 it clearly states that all is to be done in accordance with the Common Law, so, remedy is available, although hidden. This is how “they” brought in all of the Uniform Laws through D. C. and because all of the states are subdivisions with interlocking directorates, all are simply municipal corporations of D.C., and the D.C. code applies – if you are a corporation.

Ahhh, but, how does the “court system” see this? Many illustrations could be included, but, this document does not have room. I will take only the space for one small example:

In 1976 our court system (what was left of it) was flushed away. Senate Bill 94-204 deals with the court system and Senate Bill 94-381 deals with Public Law. These solidified changes in all operations of law by utilizing the words “construe and construct”. Slight deviations transfer meaning of words to fit their dolus agenda, such as, “in” changed to “at”, “at law” v. “in law”.

Lawyers, judges, and the “court system” are now allowed to change any word they wish to mean any thing they want. The “law” now means whatever they choose it to mean. It is no longer a court of “law”, but a court of “construe and construct”.

Lawyers are the guilty culprits that make these devious changes. Often their answers will reflect such changes. They intentionally misquote past cases, or other issues, as facts by making such changes. Illegal? Not according to the above Senate Bills.

So, be aware, “they” can construe “their” copyrighted laws any way they wish to fit the situation for their own betterment; and, you have no say about it. Can you use the same copyrighted codes, laws, statutes, and regulations against them? Not unless you have a license from the BAR. You will be in violation of copyright infringement and punishment is mandatory.

Learn this – there is NO LAW in this nation, or the world, for that matter. There is ONLY contract law. And, the only Bill of Rights the “courts” are required to take cognizance of is the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th. Fair nuff?

Consider the following fact of “law”, which shall be reiterated further in this document: “Judicial Notice” was commanded in the case of Hooven and Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652where the Supreme Court ruled that particular case was the last time it would address “official definitions” of the term “United States”, affirming that there are two (2) distinctly different United States with two (2) opposite forms of governments, both having the same congress. [“Opposite” means opposing!!]

2. All governments, and every agency thereof, are corporations, obtaining any jurisdictions from their Charters, as per:

Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People
– Supreme Court of the United States 1795

a. “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind onlya government can interface only with other artificial personsThe imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no governmentas well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States 1795 —–;  [NOTE: The “Supreme Court of the United States” is not the same as the “United States Supreme Court.”] and,

b. the contracts between them” involve U.S. citizens, which are deemed as Corporate Entities (remember, although all government agents and employees are 14th Amendment citizens, this Sovereign is not);

(i) The Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646 – “A ‘citizen of the United States’ is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.” and,

c. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773, “Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity“”, and,

d. “This State” and “this county” and all “municipalities” are controlled by 42 USC


This shows that every agency involved in criminal cases receives Federal funds.

Find the State code and you should find a State Agency that compares to the Coordinating Council. These are not the only agencies that grant federal funds into the States.  This is only the beginning:



Criminal justice system has ALL OF THE FUNCTIONS OF:
(a) State highway patrol, county sheriff, municipal and township police, and all other enforcement agencies.  
(b)  the court of appeals, courts of common pleas, municipal courts, county courts, and mayor’s courts when dealing with criminal cases.  
(C)  prosecuting attorneys, city directors of law,  jails and on and on.

Title 42 USC sec. 3791(a)  States means any State of the US, DC, commonwealth Puerto Rico, Units of Local Government means any city, county, township, parish, village or other general purpose subdivision of a State.

Title 42 sec. 3732 reads
The State Coordinating Council has a Director appointed by the Governor. His duties are full federal control over the States. Start to understand who you are really up against. Find the flow of money.

Title 42 sec. 3732 reads: 
(a) There is established within the Dept. of Justice, under the general authority of the AG, a Bureau of Justice Statistics (Bureau)
(b) The Bureau shall be headed by a Director appointed by the President, and with the advice and consent of the Senate – – – The Director shall have final authority for all grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts awarded by the Bureau.   The Director shall report to the AG, through the Asst. AG
(1) The name, and address of the Director per Title 42 @ 3732
(2)  Certified copy of Oath
(3)  Certified copy of bond or insurance that covers his actions
(4)  Copy of contracts awarded that award money to the State
(5)  The reports the AG made that reflect that money
Once you establish that the courts, prosecutors, public defenders, auto registration, are all claiming federal money for their operations then they commit fraud in the procedures they use, it is actionable under FALSE CLAIMS ACT.

For some interesting reading get a copy of Title 4 USC and take careful notice of the section “States”.

Also, Term “state” as used in rules providing when a state may appeal in a criminal case is all inclusive and intended to include not only the state but its political subdivisions, counties and cities. Spokane County v. Gifford, 9 Wash.App. 541, 513 P.2d 301, 302. Federal Government is a “state” bound by all of provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. Enright v. U. S., D.C.N.Y., 437 F.Supp, 580 581.

Foreign State. A foreign country or nation. The several United States are considered “foreign” to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. …  

3. An issue declared, but not rebutted, stands as Truth in Law (thus, this proper rebuttal):

a. All “U.S. citizens” were classified as “Enemies of the State” as made more explicit in our “EXHIBIT 063 – NOTICE THAT AFFIANT IS NOT A “nom de guerre”, in which we demonstrated that, pursuant to Public Law 94-412, 90 Stat. 1255 (1976), the state of national emergency has been officially terminated by the United States Congress, and accordingly, any and all authorities which might have permitted Civil Courts of Summary Jurisdiction (“Star Chambers”) to exist in American federal courts were also effectively terminated by said Public Law [See 42 U.S.C. 1986], and explicitly brought forward in EXHIBIT 063 – NOTICE THAT AFFIANT IS NOT A “nom de guerre“, with an additional eight (8) Points. For brevity, only one point will be displayed:

Point 063 A. Affiant has no record or evidence to indicate that Affiant is a combatant enemy of the State, or that Affiant is a belligerent of the government, as per; article by Chuck Morse,  “Is the ‘National Emergency of FDR’ Still In Place?” that: “This was a classic example of sleight of hand. In fact, Congress exempted all laws, based on the emergency of 1933 that were already in place. Rather than being based on the authority of the President under a ‘national emergency’ these federal laws have now been codified as a permanent part of the U.S. Federal Code. Included among the codified laws would be Section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, which classifies the American citizen as an enemy of the government.” Therefore, although the “national emergency” technically ended on September 14, 1976, when the 93rd Congress passed H.R. 3884, the National Emergencies Termination Act (50 USC 1601, Public Law 94-412), because the last paragraph said that it didn’t apply to any “authorities under the act of October 6, 1917, as amended,” the classification of a United States citizen still stands as enemy of the government, Affiant has no record or evidence that Affiant should maintain any association with the label, definition, or designation of a US citizen, or any similar appellation.

b. Under Act of Congress, May 31, 1878, c. 146, 20 Stat. 87, 31 U.S.C.A. § 404, which enacts that notes of the United States, issued during the war of the Rebellion, under acts of congress declared them to be legal tender in payment of private debts, and since the close of the war redeemed and paid in gold coin at the treasury, shall be reissued and kept in circulation, is constitutional, and notes so reissued are a legal tender.

This idea supports that, under emergency – the War of Rebellion (Civil War), the printing of Notes is Constitutional. Of course in the actual theater of war, the Constitution is suspended, and some of the Executive Orders of the War Between the States are still in full force and effect.

So, bear in mind that: 
(1) the “Emergency War Powers Act” is in full force and effect; and,
(2) though “notes” are not Lawful Money, they are declared “legal tender”; and,
(3) all U.S. citizens are declared as “enemies of the government”; and,
(4) all “legal tender” (notes of the Federal Reserve) is defined as US currency.                               

4. Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Ed., page 1420, “A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority, and the other by mere private persons.”

a. We have determined that a “mixed war” is a “Commercial War”; and, a “public authority” exercises “Private Law”; to the benefit of corporate strategy, which is not unlawful if not exercised against a “Private Person”, or “Private Man“.

b. When Congress is operating in its exclusive jurisdiction over the District of Columbia, the Territories, and enclaves, it is important to remember that it has full authority to enact legislation as private acts pertaining to its boundaries, and it is not a state of the union of States because it exists solely by virtue of the charter – compact – constitution that created it. The Constitution does not say that the District of Columbia must guarantee a Republican form of Government to its own subject citizens within its territories. (See Hepburn & Dundas v. Ellzey, 6 U.S. 445 (1805); Glaeser v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass’n., 55 F. Supp. 925 (1944); Long v. District of Columbia, 820 F.2d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Americana of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Kaplus, 368 F.2d 431 (1966), among others).

In Noah Webster’s dictionaries, pre 1969, in the abbreviation section you will find U.S.C. defined as United States of Colombia. And, then in the American Heritage Dictionary, the definition of Columbia you will find: Columbia, the United States. This notation is to “de-fuse” any assumption/presumption that this Affiant is “subject to”, or a “citizen of” any such extension/trespass against the mind, will, and conscience of Affiant, within, or without, the United States, onshore, or offshore.

c. Why were the post offices in Washington, D.C. placed under the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury???

72d Congress Sess. II CHS. 160-162
MARCH 1, 1933


March 1, 1933 [H.R. 14401.]
[Public, No. 405.]

Washington City post office.

Jurisdiction, etc. of, placed under the Secretary of the Treasury.

Vol. 30 P. 614.
U.S.C., p. 1306


To provide for placing the jurisdiction, custody, and control of the Washington City post office in the Secretary of the Treasury. [and, every post office with “zip” codes]

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Act of July 1, 1898 (U.S.C., title 40, sec. 285), is hereby amended to give to the Secretary of the Treasury exclusive jurisdiction, control, and custody of the Washington City post office and the additions thereto, located at North Capitol Street and Massachusetts Avenue, to be operated by him the same as other public buildings under his custody and control.

Approved, March 1, 1933.

d. The U.S. Attorney General is the “permanent member” to the Secretariat of the Interpol Operation, and the Secretary of Treasury the “alternate permanent member.” Under Article 30 of the “Constitution and General Regulation of Interpol, “22 USC 263(a), the agents are required to renounce their allegiance to their respective countries and expatriate. Consequently, ALL “public servants,” officials, Congressmen politicians, judges, attorneys, law enforcement personnel, the States and their various agencies, are express agents of the Foreign Principals who have bankrupted and stolen the United States (of America) through the paper money banking swindle and other frauds and treacheries. And, why is the Secretary of the Treasury also known as the US Governor for the International Monetary Fund?

e. And, how are all the “States” linked to the Feral Gubm’t?

(i) All states in the Union were reformed as franchisees or political subdivisions of the corporation known as the UNITED STATES, hence creating a new (and, different/alternate) union of American STATES. UNITED STATES CODE, Title 28, 3002(15)(A), basically reiterates that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. What was not said in 1871, but was implicit, was what is plainly stated at Title 28, 3002(15)(B) & (C): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the corporation. The “Corporation” and its’ subsidiaries have suffered at least three bankruptcies.

Much later (Conference of Governors, 1945) the legal fictions called “State of YOUR STATE” confirmed and “pledged” what was not theirs to pledge, the sweat, labor, engineering, technology, and future children of We The People, to support the indebted legal fiction, “UNITED STATES”. The full “Changing of the Guard” (state name change status) was accomplished in, I think, 1968.

(ii) The other united States is the Continental united States. This is the country founded by the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States (actually, Canada was part of the original charter). The original, organic Constitution had no title, the Preamble was the “title”. When the “constitution” was used as the corporate charter for the Act of February 21, 1781, it was given a “title”, – Constitution of the United States of America, and that IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, as in the NAME of a vessel. Please note the distinct difference and meaning in the two words “of” and “for”. Of means something belongs to something or someone else – “Constitution of (belonging to, possession) the United States of America”, v. “Constitution for (the seating of a Tribunal, seating of judgment) the united States of America”.

So, what difference does it make if they changed one tiny little word? You’d better learn. If you don’t want to learn, go back to sleep – I apologize whenever I disturb any of the “pajama people”.

f. And, how did the International Bankers become the “receivers in bankruptcy”,but first, remember, the only ones put at risk are the ones that turned in their gold to the “Securities Intermediaries! (So, how can “they” rightly claim the position of “receivers of the bankruptcy”??)

(i) Please observe the “sleight of hand” as the International Bankers slip in to “assume” the position of “Creditor”, without contributing any money, whatsoever; pay special attention to the fact that there is a “statutory” pledge and they assumed position as receiver:

Title 31 USC 3123 makes a statutory pledge of the United States government to payment of obligations and interest on the public debt.

It says, “the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the public debt” and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by the public, [you and me], as “the net public debt”.

Title 18 Sect. 8 defines ”obligation of the United States” to include……“ all certificates of indebtedness …..drawn upon authorized officers of the United States issued under any Act of Congress,” which of course includes the Secretary of the Treasury, And of course includes public law 73-10, HJR-192 which provides for its issuance as “Public Policy” in remedy for discharge of equity interest recovery on that portion of the public debt to its Principals, and Sureties bearing the Obligations of the UNITED STATES.

(ii) We must get more specific to unravel the threads of this web of deceit. In the 14th Amendment (which all “public” gubm’t employees are party to) it plainly states:

The validity of the public debt…  …shall not be questioned, and further states, the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the public debt” and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by the public, [non-14th Amendment citizens], as the NET public debt.”  

So, “public debt” is the charges against me by the several and many corporations that “service” me (government and non-government, but all corporate), and the “net public debt” is the interest due or accrued, which is to be returned to the source, (me) as Equity for my losses incurred by supporting the Beast (turning in the Lawful Money – Gold)Referenced to 14th Amendment, Section 4.

I must reiterate that it is the 14th Amendment citizen and the Treasury Department that is not to question “The validity of the public debt…”  (…shall not be questioned).

(iii) The question of “Communal Debt” arises and must be answered to clarify the issues. The Communal Debt was, and is, the debt of the Corporation(s), in particular, governments and the expense of running the same. Since the de jure governments are in position, but no offices are filled, there can be no expenses for the same. The de facto institutions of government have no “negative” expenses, as they hire only qualified pirates and thieves.

(iv) The next question that must be addressed is that of “Communal Credit”. Understand this, there was, and is, no Communal Credit. It was the Private Man under duress, coercion, threat of imprisonment, loss of life, etc., that delivered his gold to the thieves, it was not the corporate entities that turned in the gold.

(v) I am convinced that there is a one million dollar ($1,000,000) limitation on each occurrence that I may make “request for discharge” against the net public debt:

Title 26 USC section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000 limitation: “The aggregate amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not exceed $1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return).”

(vi) I must address the issue of what, or how much, in the “form of money” was created to bring about this majestic public debt. First, let me state that “money” is the ONLY creation of mankind. Next, please be informed that only the debt money is created, never the interest.

And, you can not pay a debt instrument with a debt instrument (a “bill” with a Federal Reserve Note), you can only discharge the debt – set it off into the future, so the debt accrues and climbs to a higher level with each use.

Now, in reference to (ii) above stating that “the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the public debt” and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by the public, [non-14th Amendment citizens], as “the NET public debt,” when you and I direct the Secretary of the Treasury to discharge, or setoff, our (non 14th Amendment citizen) debts, it is the accrued interest returning to its’ source, and reducing the public debt in the process.

5. We have studied, in depth, the Trading With The Enemies Act, TWEA T 50 APPENDIX App., and found the most recent edit of Title 50a of the US Code was released by the Law Revision Counsel – LRC – ( of the U.S. House of Representative on 2007-02-13  …and most recently processed by the Legal Information Institute on Fri Feb 16 04:33:56 2007. Therefore, our information seems to be most current.

a. We have determined that Sections 7, 9, and 16 of TWEA in Title 50 APPENDIX App. provides us with remedy and recourse; and, under said document, we confirm:

(i) We have administered our Claims under Oath; and,

(ii) All Claims are ONLY against Corporations; and,

(iii) All said Corporations are subject to the Secretary of State, [your] State, The United States of America.

b. In the Nature of Declaration, we solemnly state:

(i) We are NOT Austrian or Hungarian nationals. We are NOT of Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Austria-Hungary ancestry.

(ii) We ARE [your state] Nationals, example – Missourians, of Scottish, Irish, British, and an indeterminate percentage of American Cherokee and other American Indians lineage. All of our parents were of similar percentage of European and Indian stock. We exercise Right of Claim as Remaindermen and heir to all assets belonging to our natural parents.

(iii) Our declaration of citizenship (pursuant to Trading With Enemy Act, TWEA) is upon the land  as [Missourians] (not within any corporate entity). 

(iv) Our proper political standing is established in International law, the law of nations and the treaty of nations, which guarantees every man the right to make political self determination, which may vary from time to time. We are properly seated in Office of We The People.

c. TWEA states that; after one has proper standing, and has established a relationship with the Comptroller, they have a duty to protect me. They are bonded to do so and they have taken an oath to do so. You have been properly Noticed of:

(i) My declaration of citizenship was made known for this last time in Section 5b, (iii) above.

(ii) Notice has been served on the original registrars, being, they are the original fiduciary, that they, as per; UCC 1 and UCC 3 filings mentioned previously to effectively function to alleviate the distresses and eliminate the Breach of the Peace, which is the Highest Crime under International Law.

6. According to Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Revised 6th Ed (1856):

a. CONUSANCE, CLAIM OF, English law. This is defined:

(i) to be an intervention by a third person, demanding judicature in the cause against the plaintiff, who has chosen to commence his action out of claimant’s court. 2 Wilson’s R. 409.

(ii) It is a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. R. 157; 5 Vin. Abr. 588; and not between the plaintiff and defendant, as in the case of plea to the jurisdiction, and therefore it must be demanded by the party entitled to conusance, or by his representative, and not by the defendant or his attorney. Id. ibid. A plea to the jurisdiction must be pleaded in person, but a claim of conusance may be made by attorney. 1 Chit. Pl. 403.

(iii) There are three sorts of conusance. 1. Tentere placita, which does not oust another court of its jurisdiction, but only creates a concurrent one. 2. Cognitio placitorum, when the plea is commenced in one court, of which conusance belongs to another. 3. A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction; as that no other court shall hold pica, &c. Hard. 509 Bac. Ab. Courts.

b. Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, page 1531 says, “In essence, all court decisions are based on commercial law or business law and has criminal penalties associated with it.”

c. In Erie Rail Road –v- Thompkins   (1938), the U.S Supreme Court Ruled: “The United States is a Bankrupt Nation in Receivership to this Nation’s Creditors;” And, All Law is Commerce!”    

19 C.J.S. Sections 883, 884 of Chapter XVIII, Foreign Corporations follows in its entirety:

19 C.J.S. Section 883, page 541, XVIII. FOREIGN CORPORATIONS

Definition and General Considerations

A foreign corporation is one that derives it existence solely from the laws of another state, government, or country, and the term is used indiscriminately, sometimes in statutes, to designate either a corporation created by or under the laws of another state or a corporation created by or under the laws of a foreign country.

At common law, a corporation may be deemed a person, and statutes providing that corporations shall be deemed persons include foreign corporations.

Generally, the status of a foreign corporation as either foreign or domestic is determined solely by the place of its origin, without reference to the residence of its stockholders, or incorporators, or the place where the business is transacted.

However, by express enactment, a corporation, a majority of whose stock is held by aliens, is, for some purposes, deemed to be a foreign corporation. A domestic corporation does not become a foreign corporation merely by accepting from another state a grant of the right to own property and to transact business in such other state.

Federal Corporations

A federal corporation operating within a state is considered a domestic corporation rather than a foreign corporation. The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.

Section 884. Status

A corporation exists only in contemplation of law, and by force of law, and where that law ceases to operate, the corporation can have no existence. A state cannot impose one of its artificial creatures on another sovereignty nor confer on its corporators powers which they can lawfully exercise beyond its jurisdiction. Rather, it must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty.

d. And, of course the “Fed” makes grants to the States – It all Starts Here:

(i) TITLE 49 Sec. 31102. – Grants to States (and, the borrower is slave to the lender)

(ii) Commercial Vehicle Programs – All law is “commerce”, with commercial penalties.

(iii) “Your” driver license is a commercial permit. (And, it is only good for “commercial vehicles”)

7. BE INFORMED, because of Interlocking Directorates of many agencies, offices, and governmental employees working in concert and collusion, the resultant effect, due to the usurpation of authority, excess of jurisdiction, or lack of all jurisdiction, not granted by the Lawful Man, is the experiencing of major pains and penalties and other crippling injuries, as per:

a. While, on its face, “executive measures” with the red and blue lights may seem to be a way to deter crime, implementing statutes actually gives incentives to judges, police officers and district attorneys to rope as many people into the court process as possible. Like any other commission structure, it is a numbers game. The higher the number of defendants created, the higher the payout for the police officer, the judge, and the District Attorney. [SEE 1997 Court Funding Act]

b. Justice Bandeis eloquently affirmed his condemnation of abuses practiced by Government officials, who were defendants, acting as Government officials. In the case of Olmstead vs. U.S. 277 US 438, 48 S.Ct. 564, 575; 72 L ED 944 (1928) he declared:

“Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that Government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the Citizen. In a Government of laws, existence of the Government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher.

For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself. It invites anarchy. To declare that, in the administration of the law, the end justifies the means would bring a terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine, this Court should resolutely set its face.”

c. McCurdy v Montgomery County, Ohio, 240 F3d 512 (6th Cir. 2001) “government officials in general, and police officers in particular, may not exercise their authority for personal motives, particularly in response to real or perceived slights to their dignity. Surely, anyone who takes an oath of office knows – or should know – that much.”

d. “Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone, least of all in a sworn officer of the law.”In re McCowan (1917), 177 C. 93, 170 P. 1100.

e. 18 USC 31, (6) Motor vehicle.— The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

f. 18 USC 31, (10) Used for commercial purposes.— The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge, or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.

“An action by Department of Motor Vehicles, whether directly or through a court sitting administratively as the hearing officer, must be clearly defined in the statute before it has subject matter jurisdiction, without such jurisdiction of the licensee, all acts of the agency, by its employees, agents, hearing officers, are null and void.”Doolan v. Carr, 125 US 618; City v Pearson, 181 Cal.? 640.

As the majority states, failure to verify the signature of the arresting officer on the Uniform Violations Complaint precluded the district court from being vested with subject matter jurisdiction and from being empowered to act. Therefore, all proceedings in the trial court are rendered void.Buis v. State, 792 P.2d 427 (Okl. Cr. 1990).

g. “The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. The Amendment not only protects the individual against being involuntarily called as a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also privileges him not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding civil or criminal formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.”  Lefkowitz v. Turley, 94 S. Ct. 316, 414 U.S. 70 (19 73).

h. The Fourth Amendment forbids stopping a vehicle even for limited purposes of questioning its occupants unless the police officer has a founded suspicion of criminal conductU.S. V. Ramirez & Sandoval, 872 F2d. 1392.

i. Harassment by threat of fraudulent proceedings prohibited: Source: Statute at Large 1997, ch 45, § 10; Statute at Large 2005, ch 120, § 228.

(Text of section effective July 1, 2006) Harassment by threat of fraudulent legal proceedings or liens prohibited–Misdemeanor–Subsequent violation felony. Any person who harasses any other person by sending or delivering, or causing to be sent or delivered, any letter, paper, document, notice of intent to bring suit, or other notice or demand that simulates any form of court or legal process and that threatens the other person, directly or indirectly, with incarceration, monetary fines, or penalties, or with the imposition of a counterfeit lien on the real or personal property of the other person is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. A second or subsequent conviction for a violation of this section is a Class 6 felony. Lack of belief in the jurisdiction or authority of the state or of the United States is no defense to a prosecution under this section.

“A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction over the subject-matter any authority exercised is a usurped authority and for the exercise of such authority, when the want of jurisdiction is known to the judge, no excuse is permissible.” Bradley v.Fisher,13 Wall 335, 351, 352.

j. After all the above issues are brought into the light of Truth, there is but ONE JUDGMENT CALL for those at ground, grass roots, level and that is to STOP THE PIRATES AT “CRUISER” LEVELEducate them as best you can. Yes, you can starve the corporate beast. Convert them one by one. (Just bear in mind that a snake is a snake. When in doubt, ask yourself how many of your family that you love have been destroyed by an “extra close shave – the sheering of the Sheeple.” How many of your paychecks have gone to the Beast and how many of your homes have gone to the international bankers thru fraud and deceit?)

If you do not comprehend that every “patrol vehicle” is a Pirate Cruiser, then, go back and read the above until you do. I’m not saying that all pirates are bad. Most pirates are nothing more than “privateers” contracted to the “Crown”. Most are just not informed. Many actually believe they are doing a service for the community. Just remember, if you have a cow and you want a calf, you call a farmer with a bull to “service” your cow. Point clear?


Because of Interlocking Directorates and networking computerized files, you are charged with the responsibilities, duties, and directives to:

a. Assure that all related agents/agencies receive verification of this documentation, including, but not limited to:

(i) Comptroller of the Bankruptcy, because of the affect on the banking system
(ii) Secretary of State, United States
(iii) Commissioner of IRS, because of the effect on his records
(iv) U.S. Attorney General
(v) Associate U.S. Attorney General
(vi) Chief Counsel of the Office of Foreign Asset Control pursuant to 40 Stat 411

b. Accomplish the task of:

(i) Removal of our Christian Appellations from Enemy of the State database
(ii) Placing our Diplomatic Standing in National Crime Information System – presented explicitly in the National Crime Information Center.


“…there is a clear distinction between national and State citizenship. U.S. citizenship does not entitle citizen of the Privileges and Immunities of the Citizen of the State.” — K. Tashiro v. Jordan, 256 P 545, 201 Cal 239 1927), 53 ALR 1279, affirmed 49 SCt 47, 278 US 123

“… the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States do not necessarily include all the rights protected by the first eight amendments to the Federal Constitution against the powers of the Federal Government“. — Maxwell v. Dow, 176 US 581, 597 (1899)

“The right of trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment (Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 U.S. 90, 23 L. ed. 678), and the right to bear arms, guaranteed by the 2d Amendment (Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252, 29 L. ed. 615, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 580), have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, …” — Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78, 98 (1908)

“All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.” 4 U.S.C. § 72

Since you’ve read this far, you’re more knowledgeable than 99% of the population. I can predict the (not too distant) future, if you’ll practice what you’ve learned. YOU can be the change that you’re hoping will happen.

A Sovereign Citizen cannot be punished for sincerely held religious convictions, U.S. v. Cheek.

“Biblical Law at “Common Law” supersedes all laws, and “Christianity is custom, custom is Law.” Robin v. Hardaway 1790.

Habakuk, chapter 2 NASVThen the Lord answered me and said, “Record the vision, and inscribe it on tablets, that the one who reads it may run.  For it is yet for the appointed time; it hastens toward the goal, and it will not fail.  Though it tarries, wait for it; for it will certainly come, it will not delay

Behold the proud one, his soul is not right within him…

Will not all of these take up a taunt-song against him, even mockery and insinuations against him, and say, ‘Woe to him who increases what is not his — for how long — and makes himself rich with loans?  Will not your creditors rise up suddenly, and those who collect from you awaken?  Indeed, you will become plunder for them.  Because you have looted many nations, all the remainder [remnant] of the peoples will loot you — because of human bloodshed and violence done to the land, to the town and all its inhabitants.”

Final note: Earlier you learned “who” the Debtor is and where the Debtor is located. You, my friend, are the Creditor. You surrendered your gold many years ago. Your “Person” is the Beneficiary. The “Trustee” pays all the debts for the Debtor. Get your story straight. I cannot say more in THIS discourse. Oh, yes, I have lots more to say – another day.


Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [] and we’ll forward your email to the author.


Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top



If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located on the site.


Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to get you up-to-date on the latest conspiracies and to provide raw unvetted information from various sources. We are also focused on disclosing extraterrestrial contact and humanity’s lost ancient origins.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © 2022 Operation Disclosure