Has World War Three Already Started?


Operation Disclosure | By David Lifschultz, Contributing Writer

Submitted on October 25, 2021


Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899

In the early stages of the so-called coronavirus Ron Unz attributed the virus to a US biological warfare attack on China, and Iran that is hitting Russia now particularly hard:

Is the Tide Finally Starting to Turn on Covid as an American Biowarfare Attack?

Very high officials in Russian Intel say this attack on Russia is a biological warfare attack on Russia by the United States. This would mean World War Three has begun. Here we have comments by Sergei Glazyev who on Wikipedia may be regarded as a dark horse for the replacement of Vladimir Putin. See footnote 1. And we quote from the article that can be found in full in footnote 2 written by Dr. David Martin:

“According to the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, several factors speak of the man-made origin of COVID-19. First, Glazyev refers to a publication on the synthesis of a coronavirus capable of infecting people in a reputable scientific journal for 2015. The study was authored by biologists from the United States, Canada and China. Secondly, there is evidence of a patent for this invention, which was announced by the American political scientist David Lifschultz. Thirdly, there is information about the relocation of a Chinese woman scientist who worked in an American-English laboratory that synthesized the coronavirus. She moved from America to China a few months before the Wuhan epidemic. Finally, there is also unverified information that this laboratory belonged to a private Anglo-American foundation. Sergey Glazyev  stated this in his Telegram channel.


In footnote two the article by the eminent doctor David Martin says the following in part as follows. The full article is included in footnote two. The debate here is which comes first the chicken or the egg, but the contention is that the egg was an artificially created virus or a bioweapon. Even if the chicken came first, it does not mean that you cannot patent a disease and then spread it though it is illegal.  The question is who is spreading it and Russian intel says it is the US.

1 U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 20002

Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.

In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement.

Tensions between the United States and Russia are more severe that at any time since the Cold War after World War Two. The hysterical attacks by the United States against Russia, China and Iran have as their source this tripartite alliance shifting the balance of power against the United States that in reality has been surpassed by true GDP figures showing China as much larger GDP than the hollowed out US where most of its production was shifted overseas. Over half the oil production in the world is under this tripartite control. This is reflected by the ability to shut down the entire world economy by simply shutting down the Straits of Hormuz where about 22 million barrels a day of oil pass through each day, and the production of Russia and its stans which are really part of Russia is about 25 million barrels a day, and China is about five million barrels a day. If this oil was cut off, Goldman Sachs estimates the price of oil would rise to a thousand dollars a barrel. If the present oil production represents 4% of the world GDP, and if you multiplied it 12.5 times from say 80 dollars a barrel, then its percentage of the GDP would be 50% roughly speaking. This would crash the world economy by itself not to speak of the 2.5 quadrillion derivative market overlapping a world GDP of about 93 trillion dollars that Warren Buffett regards as a financial weapon of mass destruction for which reason he has over 100 billon dollars of cash in his Berkshire Hathaway to cover potential derivative problems at his insurance companies. The 2.5 trillion figure is from prominent Swiss banking sources though some Swiss say 1.5 quadrillion. The Bank for International Settlements says about 600 trillion but this is a make believe figure to calm the nerves. This is discussed in detail in footnote three.

It appears from this discussion that World War Three has already begun.

Footnote 1:


Alongside Sergey Lavrov and Dmitry Medvedev, Glazyev is often spoken about as a potential successor of Putin. “In view of the difficult economic situation in the country, the assumption that Glazyev will take perhaps the central position in government is heard more and more often.”

Vtoroy, Mark (September 15, 2015). “Who’s next? Three possible successors to Putin (an article that first appeared in Politrussia, translated by J. Arnoldski)”.

Footnote 2:


Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899


Will a French Revolution hit France preceding that predicted by Ray Dalio for the United States? That is the question of the day.

Billionaire Hedge-Fund Manager Warns a “Revolution” Is Coming

This is from our European Correspondent:  Note the Trotskyite censorship in the west which they control where the French Senate voted 262 to 64 against vaccination mandates and it was not covered by the New York Times or any of the controlled world media. This is not just a US problem. We are not against control per se but control by those who wish to subvert Christian or Islamic traditions as in the case of the Taliban as many of their social rules come right out of the Bible outlawed in our US public schools and attacked every day in the press. As far as forcing 7 plus billion people to vaccinate with an untested vaccine as guinea pigs violates their civil rights and heretofore medical rules on testing vaccines for at least five to ten years to be sure they do not create more harm than good. This forcible testing violates the principles of the Nuremberg Code as outlined in the next link and footnote one.

Demonstrations all over France October 16


As many demonstration against the Vaccination passsport and mandatory vaccination as ever before in France, in all cities, villages, town, and in Paris. There was one in Vannes, a smaller town in the middle of France. The police cleared out the old city steets with tear gas. But one man remained. Here you can see all what makes France great throughout history in just a few seconds:

II. Gilets Jaunes Act II

They are back in force for the first time this weekend after a long absence when they stopped demonstrating right before the so called pandemic began, in fact it can be argued that a reason for the French lockdowns was that the country was in tatters and no longer governable with massive strikes and Gilets Jaunes making the streets unsafe at the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020. 

Gilets Jaunes this weekend are making a comeback but ARE NOT DEMONSTRATING AGAINST VACCINATION MANDATES BUT AGAINST INFLATION. They are demonstrating because of government mismanagement of gas and food prices. Supply prices going through the roof.

Gilets Jaunes Act II, the rap song:

They are back!

Gilets Jaunes surrounding the police:

Gilets Jaunes stopping traffic throughout France:

III. French Senate Rejects Compulsory Vaccination for All

Oh and when this week the French Senate voted October 13 on making vaccination mandatory for all French citizens (and forcing all children to be vaccinated for good measure), but the new measure was rejected by 262 – 64. 


Oh well, common sense actually prevailed?

However, would you know that Le Monde, the French equivalent of the New York Times, refused to report that the measure had been soundly rejected? And that in fact it is even hard to find on Google or in legacy media in general, even in the media in France, that the French Senate soundly rejected compulsary vaccination for all. Why not reported anywhere? Including the Anglo – American press. This sure looks like military grade information warfare. 

Why do I have to report on this?!

One would hope to think this would be a major news item, no? 

Here is a single news link that explains the story: 

Did we miss something?

For good measure here is the list of the 64 Jacobins that had wanted compulsory vaccination for all in France. The history of what happened to the vile Jacobins after Napoleon took over is pretty well known and ought to serve as a sober guideline for those who do not want history to repeat …

David Lifschultz


Guest Posting


If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top


If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located on the site.

Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to get you up-to-date on the latest conspiracies and to provide raw unvetted information from various sources. We are also focused on disclosing extraterrestrial contact and humanity’s lost ancient origins.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © 2022 Operation Disclosure