Advertisement
______________________________________________________

Rob Cunningham: All Wars are Banker’s Wars

0
3
Advertisement

______________________________________________________

Rob Cunningham | KUWL.show
@KuwlShow

“All Wars Are Banker’s Wars” follows a coherent logic: whoever controls financing influences how a war begins, how long a war continues, which interests survive & what obligations remain after the war ends.

Let’s “follow the money” before the C---d conflict, through the emergency & into the settlement.

There is substantial historical grounding for this recurring pattern:

1 War creates a government’s urgent dependence on creditors

The Bank of England was founded in 1694 to raise £1.2 million for England’s war against France. Its formation directly connected private investment, government borrowing & military power. War financing was part of the institution’s founding purpose.

The underlying bargain is straightforward: the government receives purchasing power immediately; creditors receive financial claims supported by the government’s future revenues. The battlefield emergency becomes a lasting financial relationship.

2 Financing a belligerent creates an interest in its success

In 1915, J.P. Morgan & Co. arranged a $500 million loan to Britain & France. The firm also acted as their purchasing agent, securing almost $3 billion in munitions & raw materials, according to JPMorgan’s own history. Financing & military procurement were closely connected.

The “follow the money” reasoning identifies the incentive: once repayment depends on a government’s survival & financial strength, its fortunes matter to its creditors. That creates a path from financial exposure to political influence.

3 The connection between creditors, newspapers & war policy was explicitly recognized in 1914

Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan warned President Wilson that lenders to belligerents could use their newspaper influence to support the countries they financed, because the outcome would affect their securities. He also warned these financial interests would make American neutrality harder to maintain.

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

That document directly supports an important part of this reasoning: financial commitments can create incentives to shape public opinion & government decisions. This concern existed in contemporary correspondence at the highest level of government.

4 Wars reorganize monetary policy around government financing

During World War I, the Federal Reserve facilitated war-bond sales & offered preferential lending terms to banks purchasing Treasury certificates. During World War II, it supported government borrowing by pegging Treasury interest rates.

Within this recurring framework, the significance is institutional: emergency financing brings government, banking & monetary policy into closer alignment. Decisions affecting the whole population become organized around sustaining the war effort.

5 The War settlement establishes the next financial order

In July 1944, while World War II continued, representatives of 44 countries met at Bretton Woods. Their agreements established the framework for the IMF & the International Bank for Reconstruction & Development, now part of the World Bank.

The financial consequences reach beyond funding destruction: the postwar settlement determines reconstruction financing & the institutions through which countries subsequently obtain assistance.

Applied to the 2019–2020 C---d Plandemic War, the pattern is:

Financial fragility exists before the emergency.

The emergency redirects public attention & expands government authority.

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

Extraordinary interventions protect financial markets & existing claims.

The resulting debts & institutional arrangements persist afterward.

This is a logically consistent within all previous premises. The historical examples establish mechanisms through which conflict, credit, political influence, and monetary reorganization reinforce one another.

This recurring theme has substantial historical support as the driving force of financial power motivating war and its aftermath, as well asthe universal claim about who deliberately starts wars for financial gain & greater control.

Source(s):
• https://x.com/KuwlShow/status/2112648905725001997

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [voyagesoflight@gmail.com] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Operation Disclosure is an independent media platform dedicated to exploring global geopolitics and alternative perspectives. Our mission is to provide a central hub for diverse viewpoints on world events, including independent research into exopolitics, aerial phenomena (UAP), and the historical origins of humanity. We believe in providing a platform for information that encourages deeper inquiry into the world around us.

Disclaimer: The content on Operation Disclosure—including articles, videos, and images—is contributed by our readers or curated for informational and educational interest. Views, opinions, and claims expressed in these posts belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Operation Disclosure. We do not guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of this content; therefore, we encourage all readers to engage with the material with a spirit of personal inquiry and discernment.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure Official

Advertisement