Advertisement

Self-Reflection Time [25]: Return to the Nature of Things

0
2323
Advertisement

______________________________________________________

Operation Disclosure Official

By Peter W, Contributing Writer
Submitted on July 19, 2025

DISCLAIMER: I am NOT artificial intelligence NOR am I here to entertain or distract you from what truly matters in your life.  The following are my thought flows and words alone and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or position of anyone else.  If my words resonate with you then perhaps they will better inform your understanding…if NOT, then I wish you well on your journey of discovery.

I learned a long time ago that “if anything is meant to be then it is up to me.”  I am my own provider and cavalry.  This quote certainly held true of my own situation.  This is why in over 32 years on active duty in the U.S. military, no human being under my command ever lost their life…I brought everyone home alive regardless of how challenging the situation, mission, opposition, circumstances, and environment…and the mission was accomplished successfully every time, on time.  Perhaps my greatest life accomplishment was achieving objectives without the need to take life (freely aligning with God’s intentions and will) because I always respected my opposition and made clear my intentions and actions to those who desired to know.  This is in my nature and house mandate. 

God kept me in the game despite the efforts and ill-intentions of others who indirectly and directly projected their ill-will to me, my situation, and those around me.  Life knocked me down too many times to count but I always got back up and pressed ceaselessly onward.  I had no choice in the matter, I was preparing to lead my family lineage and my example was expected to set a standard of mindset and behavior (BE, KNOW, and DO) that my family and those around me could follow.

My paternal lineage made it clear to me high expectations that I would take what they provided and move the needle way beyond the meter’s peg (limit).  My paternal grandfather connected me with the past while my father created technologies that would advance the current positive development agenda to enable us all to be where we are today.  He had to operate within the system (but not of it) to ensure mission completion which meant that he had to persist beyond the nefarious and beneficial use of his efforts by others because our species had to ceaselessly press onward to achieve God’s plan for humanity.  While he engaged with projects in ways that supported the defense of safety, security, and survival, he also created technologies that ensured documentation that I can assuredly say enabled accountability for those with nefarious intent.  Ego was absent within him because he had achieved his intellectual potential and thus didn’t need to prove his worth to anyone but God.  I digress. 

“If it is meant to be then it is up to me.”  Perhaps this belief applies to all conscious beings.  So, why this article submission now?  Why share at this time?  I’ve endeavored to build on my lineage’s contributions to humanity’s development and further serve humanity by and with my intellect, example and actions.  Everyone is special and limited in one way or another; with certain competencies, capabilities, judgment, and their developed self-control (emotional, mental, physical, and spiritual).  Some are more developed (near the upper control limit) than others but collectively WE are within the control limits (upper and lower) of humanity.  The highest control limit being spiritual (consciousness) which goes beyond our physical manifestations.  

My grandfather shared that humans are a special species in the “eyes” of God and we have a role in the cosmos.  Everyone is anxious to see our species develop and reach our potential.  Some are fearful of our development while others pray everyday and are patiently waiting for our species to assume our role (our potential) which was ordained a very very long time ago by God.  We exist on God’s Heart…the Earth…for a reason.  Our potential culminates the potential of all species.  My words are not born of ego but from God’s love to our species.  How do I know this?  We are still present as a species and evolving / moving forward despite the efforts of the nefarious.  We wouldn’t be here and continuing to develop unless God didn’t will it so.

We, as a species, are on a consciousness trajectory that needs a little bump up to ensure we make PIM (plan of intended movement).  This submission endeavors to contribute to that little bump up.   

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

It has been a long time in the making, the reset cycle of “death and life” and its associated struggle.  Some call this evolution (lower level); some call it ascension (upper level).  These labels don’t adequately encompass our collective development.  We had to evolve to be at the point where we could ascend.  As a species we have been beat down hard multiple times to evolve our physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual aspects…to learn that the material world is but a vehicle to get us to the point where we could evolve our consciousness…to awaken and ascend beyond our corporal existence.  It has taken a very very long time to develop our capacity for self-control.  All creators have the capacity to destroy.  Some are very good at destroying and limited in their capacity to create.  

What am I talking about?  To have a seat at God’s table we have to earn it through development of our nature…our capacity to create and destroy along with the self-control and sound judgment to know how to apply our capacities for the betterment of all beings.  We cannot reach our potential relying solely on good intentions, we must demonstrate good / sound judgment to generate complete solutions which require our development way beyond the ego in order to assume our pre-ordained roles in the cosmos.

“Nature” as commonly known often refers to our external environment (plants, animals, terrain, etc) as well as our internal environment  (character, competence, capability, sound judgment, and self-control).  It is made of cycles, like water, with ebbs and flows.  Un-influenced human nature is overall good and creative but can be influenced to destroy because we have the capacity to both create and destroy.  Even in destruction we create karma, fate in our future existence…”what comes around, goes around”…”We reap what we sow”…”those who live by the sword, die by the sword”…kind of stuff.

Our present trajectory began long ago with the sons of Adam (Cain, Abel, and Seth); all of which were patent creations developed to serve a corporate mission.  But, there were two agendas at play…God’s agenda for humanity and the others’ agenda for resources.  They others weren’t savvy enough to understand God’s role for them in his plan.  Cain destroyed more than he created; Abel created more than he destroyed; and, Seth (Abel’s replacement) had Abel’s nature plus the intellect, capacities of Cain, and self-control beyond both his older siblings that made him most valuable of the three in the development of humans which is why both their bloodlines were protected.  Most humans are a hybrid from the lineage of Cain and Seth, which is why we see both “Evil” and “Good” in the world to this day.

The modern American story didn’t start until George Washington arrived on scene.  My Grandfather told me that America is the center of God’s heart.  Essentially, this was the reason my paternal family immigrated to the U.S.  The story of George Washington presented to the public is not entirely accurate. He was a man of great intellect and in the system, but not of it.  He had a metaphoric foot in both camps (in/of the system)…but, God used General Washington in the system to evolve God’s preference for “Good.”  And, God uses all (both good and evil) to accomplish his plan.  

There is a reason why the American’s call our first war…the Revolutionary War…and, the British call that very same war…the War for Independence.  Thus, from the beginning, we are shown that narratives shape perspective and that manipulation happens most easily in a binary narrative environment. Our first “American war” was, in effect, a corporate war to unify the American colonies under one corporation.  Hard to believe, right?  What are the minimum requirements for a corporation to register?  Well, they need a CEO (Chief Executive Officer) also known as a PRESIDENT; they need a charter (i.e. a corporate CONSTITUTION which dictates how the corporation operates); they need a TREASURER; and, they need a SECRETARY.  I digress.

Each of the American Colonies were independently chartered, administered, and often made decisions to the detriment of other corporate colonies and ultimately to the British Crown corporation.  Effectively, the American Colonies had survived their environment (think what happened to Jamestown) and evolved to the point where they were independently making impacts (negative and positive) for the British Crown corporation.  The earlier French and Indian conflict consolidated land territory and trained a sufficient amount of colonial militia in guerrilla warfare Indian / native style which set the terrain fighting tone for the subsequent Revolutionary war for independence.

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

All the corporate American colonies were registered under the corporate administration of the British Crown Corporation.  Everyone in the colonies were party to the loose collective British West Indies Corporation and chartered out of England.  

Also, be mindful that often a leader’s assigned role in any conflict can be discerned by the results of their subsequent assignments. General Lord Charles Cornwallis (1st Marquess) was the southern colonies administrator who over time became the commanding general for the British forces in the American colonies due to failures of the other British Colony Corporate Administrators (British Generals)…to become the lead administrator on behalf of the British Crown Corporation.

It was a sound strategy; consolidate, both sides then turnover to one local corporate administrator.  Consolidate the various British Corporation Colonial Administrators and Consolidate the Colonists under their own corporate military (militia) colonial administrator; then, “publicly turn over” British Corporate Colonial Administration to a lead local militia Corporate Colonial Administrator…all under the British Crown Corporation.  But, how to implement?  Both sides had to play their roles in the plan.  First, get the lead Colonial Militia leader to use Indian tactics on the troops of the various British colony corporations to the point that they would have to consolidate with the British Crown selected Lead British Colonial Corporate Administrator (General Lord Cornwallis).  Use the French to “help” train / support the local militia to make them a regular force for administration of the new Corporation.  if the colonists were waning in their efforts to stay focused on the plan then give them a “win” or two to keep them in the fight.  The French were no different than the Hessians to the British…both were used strategically in the plan.   

Once the Revolutionary war was “won”…then delegate the new corporation administration to General Washington.  Delegation of the American Colonial Administration was completed by General Lord Charles Cornwallis to General George Washington.  At the “surrender” ceremony (note General Cornwallis wasn’t at the “surrender” ceremony…interestingly, President Trump was not at the 2020 inauguration of President Biden).  Could it be that the WHs are using that same British plan in reverse to take over the Crown Corporation today?  Take a closer look at POTUS Trump’s “world tour of 2017” and the local’s response during his visits.  I digress.  Back to the Revolutionary war for independence surrender ceremony.  During that ceremony General Cornwallis’s officer sword was passed around the room but given back to the senior British Army Officer representing Cornwallis and the fact that Cornwallis left the American theater with his sword in hand. 

Now wrap your head around this…IF the surrender at Yorktown was an actual military conflict surrender situation and not a corporation turnover then General Cornwallis would not have received his sword back. His sword would have been on display in a museum and a part of historical artifacts (the “crown” war trophy) of the conflict and his name would be on the Crown’s black list and his family titles as well as lands would be forfeit because of the embarrassment to the Crown.  That would have been a little over the top if you made good on a new plan to administrate the colonies but in alignment with the Crown.  

Why did John Hancock write his name so BIG on the declaration of independence?  Psychological Operation for the common colonists?  We were told it was to spite King George’s ego.  So the King had an Ego?  if you “Lost” the second largest part of your income portfolio, do you think you would reward the one who was at the helm when that ship ran aground and “sunk?”  What if the REVOLUTIONARY WAR was a psychological operation using military conflict to consolidate and unify the various corporate colonies under one American Corporation (led by a freemason) that benefited the British Crown Corporation?  Often human plan implementations don’t follow intentions…because of God’s provided free will. I’ll get back to this point later.

Rather than using rhetoric, let’s talk about what happened to General Lord Charles Cornwallis post “war of corporate Independence.“ Well, after successfully “losing” the corporate conflict in the American Colonies, General Lord Cornwallis and Benedict Arnold were cheered when they arrived in Britain in January 1782!!!  Why would anyone celebrate a “loser” when we typically celebrate winners?  In a psychological operation, sometimes you gotta “lose” publicly in the eyes of the target American audience to win in the behind-the-scenes strategic fight owned by the British Crown Corporation. I digress; back to my point.

General Lord Charles Cornwallis “retired” publicly (exited the public stage) until 1783 when the Treaty of Paris was signed (ending the Revolutionary War for Independence) which addressed territorial allocation between Corporate France, Corporate Spain, and Corporate America on the American Continent. Perhaps he retired behind the scenes to continue working deals to hammer out this Treaty in private for a public signing?  A fledgling American collective set of colonies wouldn’t be postured to broker a treaty of this magnitude…the British crown had to underwrite this effort…out of benevolence or perhaps benefit to their plain?  Thus, the corporate public fight was over with the signing of the 1783 Treaty of Paris.  Then Cornwallis went through some British public theater drama (public psyops distraction) until he returned to the strategic fight (temporary additional duties?) under the good graces of King George III in 1785 to be posted as British Ambassador to Fredrick the Great (Prussia) to work a possible ALLIANCE.  Sound like reconnaissance for a similar mission as the strategic consolidation fight in the American Colonies?  

In 1786 he was given the Governor General position in India…lead administrator for the British East India Company…the crown jewel in the British Crown income portfolio.  Actually, in 1782 General Cornwallis was offered the Administrator-only role in India but held out until he was also given command of military forces in India as well in 1786.  Or was it that he was waiting for British forces to depart America (Nov 25, 1783 – Evacuation Day) to reset, reconstitute, and be made available to him in India?  Does this sound like how an Ego-centric King would “reward” a loser?  By giving him lead on the Crown’s income portfolio?  Everybody loves a “loser?” Sure.

From 1783 to 1787 (note that it took four years) the American colonies hammered out the U.S. Constitution, a document required of a corporation.  What if General Lord Charles Cornwallis was still in charge of the American Colonies until 1786 when he was posted to India?  He would be available and postured (if necessary) to privately advise General Washington in the administration of the American Corporation until it was clear that a corporate charter could be delivered; or, perhaps because General Cornwallis was planning execution of the next phase of the Crown’s plans; or, perhaps a little of both?  It is important to keep in mind that Washington, a freemason, fought the British Crown for ownership of the American Colonies. BUT, sometimes intended strategic Crown plans don’t exactly work out as desired.  Under normal procedure writing a corporate constitution is overseen by the President of the Corporation.  But, General Washington had a different plan; perhaps one influenced by the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia (sovereign nation-states).  He let Thomas Jefferson (NOT a freemason) work with the colonies to hammer out the constitution…kind of like having the employees write the rules for the corporation.  

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

When you let the inmates write the rules, higher headquarters leadership (British Crown Corporation) sometimes doesn’t exactly get what it wants or plans for. Inmates running the asylum???  Free-will, maybe?  Can’t have that can we?  Payback can oftentimes be fatal as General Washington we were told contracted a “throat infection” and subsequently dies at age 67 (after his physicians bled him out) on December 14, 1799 (interestingly 1799 the same year Napoleon took power in France via a coup).  1799 was thirteen years after General Cornwallis assumed command in India (1786) (which was before the U.S. Constitution was finally ratified in 1787)…a little numeric symbolism?  Interestingly, the youngest individual to sign the Declaration of Independence (Charles Carroll, III (1737-1832)) died at the age of 95.  Thomas Jefferson lived to the age of 83 and Benjamin Franklin died at the age of 84.  So, the locals had noteworthy life expectancies.  But, we are led to believe that a Man (G. Washington) with an iron constitution, who survived the harshest outdoors environment for years fighting the British Army, somehow dies (medically assisted) of a random “throat infection” living his daily existence in the domestic environment???  Perhaps payback for NOT ensuring the American corporate alignment with the Crown?  

Under President Jefferson, the 1803 Louisiana Purchase (828K square miles) resulted in the United States at the time (890K square miles) becoming 1.7M square miles.  That’s a lot of resources and potential states that could form…making it harder to Crown control or get back under control given the 1787 ratified U.S. Constitution.  The easiest solution is to replace the U.S. Constitution with another version but you gotta do it so that few people know and you gotta hide the evidence.  But, if you are successful in swapping documents then you have effectively pulled off a coup without bloodshed to take back control; definitely least costly approach.

So, how do you do a bait and switch on THE document that is a thorn in one’s Crown / freemason side?  Well, why not have another “war” and burn down the “house” containing the very document that is the thorn in your side?  Wasn’t that the strategic reason for the war of 1812 where the British burned down Washington, D.C. in 1814?  But, you can’t just burn THE building containing the document…that would be too obvious…you gotta burn a number of buildings around THE building to provide room for a different narrative.  Also, perhaps “payback” for American ingratitude that did not “honor” a previous agreement with General Washington to gain British support for the 1783 Treaty of Paris?

The public reason for the war of 1812 was because of disputes regarding trade, territory, and impressment.  Why burn the city (Washington, D.C.) that contained our founding documents?  Why kinetic instead of economic war on Washington, D.C.?  More payback and symbolism against George Washington?  What about the constructed half-naked statue of Washington or the phallic Washington Monument?  George Washington was a quaker and wore modest clothing.  Perhaps a little symbolic insult to injury in the name of “honoring” the man?  

We were told a narrative as to why Washington DC vice Philadelphia, New York, or Boston was burned in 1814 in the history books…because of British convenience.  But, who did the burning?  We were told the British Army burned Washington D.C.  What, the British didn’t have any useful idiot Antifa or intel spies back then to send out with torches to burn buildings?  How symbolic?  You spite the hand of a favored Senior British General (General Lord Charles Cornwallis) so they send in the Army to make the mission.  I digress.

But, to be able to successfully execute the bait and switch of our irritating U.S. Constitution wouldn’t you have to have American Leadership in on the plan?  Enter James Monroe, a Freemason and Secretary of State to President James Madison (NOT a freemason but had some involvement with that organization), who ordered Stephen Pleasonton to “save” key artifacts (declaration of Independence, Constitution, etc).  so, exactly, which version of the Constitution was actually saved???  Would it be the version that offended the crown??  If Pleasonton grabbed the “wrong” version as he was running out the door, do you think he would tell anyone?  And, if you were James Monroe, couldn’t you communicate one thing upchannel (Masons) and do another?  How would anyone know until it was too late?

Does anyone believe the “Author” of the U.S. Constitution (James Madison) would have allowed his masterpiece (words in the Constitution) to be lost in a fire?  I learned a narrative that there were two copies of the Constitution AND that President Madison so loved the words of the Constitution that he authored as well as his friend George Washington that he made his own exact copy of the original Constitution and sent if off to New England before or at the beginning of the 1812 War. Clearly, the version saved from fire was a version that was just a little less offensively worded (decentralized power) and implemented, but kept intent perhaps?  Another “Washington deal” not honored?  After all, who honors deals in Washington???  Interestingly, the war of 1812 lasted for about 2 years and 8 months. If the mission was to get THE document burned…and you thought the document was burned and replaced with an acceptable version then wouldn’t you end the costly conflict you started because you completed your mission objective?  For comparison, the Revolutionary War lasted 8 years and 4 months; and, the Napoleonic wars lasted for over 12 years.

How quickly others assume what human nature it is to hold others to a level of accountability that they refuse to hold themselves to!!?  Ends justify the means, perhaps?  Sometimes, I guess, you gotta “go along with the plan” in order to keep what you worked for, perhaps?  James Madison later died at the age of 85 (he wasn’t bled out by physicians).  So, clearly he was publicly assumed to have completed the mission and did not offend the powers that be.

With America operating alone and unafraid, fast forward to the American Civil War.  When the version of the constitution saved didn’t quite meet the Crown Corporation mark and American Public wanted leadership change (there we go again inmates running the asylum), why not start another war to divide and conquer the American corporation?  President Lincoln expertly navigated that nefariously ill-willed effort.  When he came out on top, what to do?  If you can’t enjoin him then why not replace him?  President Lincoln was eliminated and replaced with Tennessee master freemason President Andrew Johnson in 1865.  Teeing up the k--l shot to the Constitution?  It wasn’t until the Act of 1871 (under President Grant) that the United States Corporate takeover finally occurred with a new corporate charter (under act of 1871) where Washington, D.C. became corporate headquarters and thus the “American Republic” (United States Corporation).

Permanent and total control of the United States corporation didn’t occur until President Wilson when the Federal Reserve act of 1913 occurred.  Interestingly, Mike King does a good job with his “dig’em up” series efforts to point out which American leaders were nefariously “removed” to ensure the elite approved strategic agenda objectives.

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

Fast forward to President Kennedy’s EO 11110 which allowed printing under Treasury of the Silver Certificates where the Crown Corporation felt a challenge to the primary control agenda.  He was eliminated and replaced with a “team” player in another President Johnson taking on the Presidency following an elimination effort.  Fast forward to President Trump.  It took his first, “second”, and third presidency (45-47) to successfully threaten the long-standing system of control, force this system to self-eliminate, and concurrently ensure a follow-on system was in place to allow a return to the nature of things.

So what?!  Why should you care?  I’m suggesting one do their own research and draw their own conclusions because a weak foundation eventually destroys all houses.  And, ignorance eventually leads to destruction of one’s world.

Now we wait on the execution of a plan to return to the nature of things; where what was intended long ago gets the opportunity to actually be implemented once again.  I remain hopeful that this new old system will enable filtering-in the good while self-eliminating the bad so that the human species can once again gain the opportunity to more rapidly ascend in our development efforts.   We’ll see; the “devil” is always in the details and implementations often fail.  The present is all we can hope to control and the future is not guaranteed except by God’s love.  More importantly, because of God’s love he gave us free-will and thus, the only thing we can hope to control is ourselves through self-mastery (self-command and self-control)…which is a prominent strategic objective of his plan.  Sir Julian Corbett (Some Principles of Maritime Strategy, 1911) clearly outlines the point about limits of control; one can only control that which is around them and for a limited scoped timeframe (while they are present).

Have my words got your attention?

You be the judge.

Check out my other posts:  https://operationdisclosureofficial.com/?s=reflection+time%3A+peter+w

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [voyagesoflight@gmail.com] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to get you up-to-date on the latest conspiracies and geopolitics. We also aim to provide raw unvetted information about world events from various sources and user submitted research on topics such as exopolitics, extraterrestrial and UFO/UAP sightings, secret space programs, and the lost or ancient origins and history of humanity.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure

Advertisement