(Reader: Doug Duff) Connect the Dots

Reader Post | By Doug Duff

CONNECT THE DOTS…

Point 1: Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933  (49STAT3097) Treaty Series 881 – convention on Rights & Duties of the States – Congress took State statutes off and put the States under international law. State statutes don’t hold standing in international law.

Point 2: International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945 – – Congress relinquished every public office over to the UN. Local governments up to the president fall under UN jurisdiction. Congress gave the UN the right to dictate what laws will be international & gave them the right to tax the States.

Point 3: International Reorganization Rescind Act- Congress put this into form but they never took action to rescind the act. Fairly recently an Ohio judge filed suit claiming that Congress did not have the right to relinquish government authority over to the UN (a corporation or foreign country) and that the Congressional act was a constitutional violation because they didn’t put it to the States or the people to agree on it. In 2005 the US Supreme court declined to hear the case therefore all public offices are under UN jurisdiction & they are NOT American Citizens.

Point 4: Oath of Office – Title 5 USC  331, 332, 333 backed up by Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations  92.12 – 92.31 and Title 8 USC, section 1481 – the public official relinquishes his national citizenship and are thus foreign agents as stipulated under Title 22 USC, chapter 11, section 611, loss of national citizenship  —  Public officials are no longer US Citizens, but rather are foreign agents and must register as such.

Point 5. U.S.C.A. § 951. Agents of foreign governments (who are these “agents?”)

(a) (3) any officially and publicly acknowledged and sponsored member of the staff of, or employee of, an officer, official, or representative described in paragraph (1) or (2), who is not a United States citizen; (See Points 1, 2, & 3 above)

Point 6. What about all the “liars” – ummm Lawyers operating in the U.S.?

The general consensus say that because B.A.R. stands for British Accreditation Regency it means that all lawyers, even in the US, pledge allegiance to Britain and are under the rule of the Queen.

Point 6: Article III, section 1, clause 1,”The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;–to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;–to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;–to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;–to Controversies between two or more States;–between a State and Citizens of another State;–between Citizens of different States;–between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.”

 The 11th Amendment was an amendment to Article III of the Constitution for the united States of America, which stripped the courts of any judicial power by stating, “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.”

This explains why I say that all “officials” are Agents of a Foreign State.

Since it (the 11^th Amendment) was ratified after the Judicial Act of 1787 which created all the inferior courts and the attorney generals office (see US Attorney’s manual 3-2.110), it applies to the States. Georgia ratified the 11th Amendment on 11/29/1794 and ratification was completed on 2-7-1795.

There are no Judicial courts in America and there have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178).

(i) And, do the “courts” enforce laws, or codes? Answer: Code is supreme. “Where both the code and general principles are available, the former should always be considered and applied if applicable.  By legislative declaration the code is the law, and if general principles appear inconsistent, they must be considered displaced under AS 45.05.006.  Moreover, even where inconsistency does not exist, the code must be regarded as supreme; general principles even when consistent with the code are merely supplementary“. Prince v. LeVan, 486 P.2d 959, 9 UCC Rep.Serv. 367 (1971).  Kelly v. Miller, 575 P.2d 1221, 23 UCC Rep.Serv. 632 (1978)

(ii) But, are “judicial” courts necessary? Answer: The particular need for making the judiciary independent was elaborately pointed out by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist, No. 78, from which we excerpt the following:

“The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The Legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The Judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will, but merely judgment.” WE HAVE NOT HAD THIS BALANCE OF POWER FOR A VERY LONG TIME!!

(iii) The “ideal” of checks and balances within government structure has long been a thing of the past.

The Reconstruction Acts took away the Lawful Standing, the Lawful Capacity, from the Citizens and changed their Lawful Standing to “Legal Status”, from ELECTORS in a THREE BRANCH GOVERNMENT as they were in Original Jurisdiction, to REGISTERED VOTERS in a TWO BRANCH GOVERNMENT.

Want proof? Go to your local City Clerk and ask for a CERTIFIED COPY of your City Charter in any State, or your local County Clerk for a CERTIFIED COPY of your County Charter in any State. You will discover that ALL cities and counties in your State have only two branches, the Executive and Legislative. There is no Judicial Branch!! The Judicial Districts were all abolished in 1856 by the Act of the 34th Congress.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1860, reviewing the Act of the 34th Congress, ordered ALL the States in existence at that time to close down all the Court’s of law and all courts complied in 1860. None of the Court’s of any State are created by the Constitution of their State.

Every Court, from top to bottom, the justice of the peace courts, the police courts, the municipal courts, the district courts and the circuit courts are ALL Statutory Courts created by Statutes which were enacted by the Legislature and in fact, and law, merely Administrative Agencies and only have the authority conferred by Statute.

z. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178).

(i) Modes of enforcement are erratic and arbitrary, a ground for prosecution is anybody’s guess, and the operation in the law is shrouded in mystery. In most any issue at hand we might suggest the following:

“This ordinance is void for vagueness, both in the sense that it “fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute,” United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617, and because it encourages arbitrary and erratic arrests and convictions. Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88; Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S. 242.”

When this court found that the Internal Revenue agents had violated the law and that the improperly seized records were to be returned, the agents were, to say the least, not happy.  More than once have judges of a court been indirectly reminded that they too are taxpayers.

No sophisticated person is unaware that even in this commonwealth the Internal Revenue Service has been in possession of facts with respect to public officials which it has presented or shelved in order to serve what can only be called political ends, be they high or low.  And a judge who knows the score is aware that every time his decisions offend the Internal Revenue Service, he is inviting a close inspection of his returns.? Lord v. Kelley, 240 F.Supp. 167 (1965).

(ii) Dear Friends: this all leads to domestic terrorism! Please follow:

18 USC 2331. – Definitions. As used in this chapter –

(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that –

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended –

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

aa. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502).

bb. We (as corporate entities) own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten, 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481).

cc. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037).

dd. You (as corporate entities) cannot use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of City of Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520) That’s why I rely on YOUR (Mr. President) sworn Oath to keep my Rights as “secured by the Constitution”.

ee. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.

However, please be mindful that, it is not until you get to Article 10 (PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630) – Construction with other laws that you begin to see that the laws of the Republic were left in place in Section 28:10-104; Laws not repealed. And, remember, in UCC 1-103.6 it clearly states that all is to be done in accordance with the Common Law, so, remedy is available, although hidden. This is how “they” brought in all of the Uniform Laws through D. C. and because all of the states are subdivisions with interlocking directorates, all are simply municipal corporations of D.C., and the D.C. code applies – if you are a corporation.

We’ve talked a little about “Law,” Now, let’s talk about “Money.” Bear in mind that True Law and True Currency have ALWAYS been joined at the hip. When the People lost their “gold” (True Currency) in 1933, we, completely, lost our access to True Law, or what was left of it.

(i) The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654).

(ii) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)

(iii) The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816).

(iv) The IRS is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), not the U.S. Government. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.). See also: Bretton Woods Agreement, as amended.

SEE: Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America Regarding The Headquarters Of the United Nations, Section 7(d) & (8), 22 U.S.C.A 287 (1979 Ed.) at pg. 241). It is to be further observed that the “Agreement” regarding the Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional Record – Senate, December 13, 1967, Mr. Thurmond), and is illegally in the Country in the first instant.

Continuing on, as you read the points of interest concerning “taxing and monetary systems,” please remember that Unidroit in Rome, Italy and Unidroit OWNS the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) and that the U.S. Government pays them $260,000 per year for its use. Now, read on.

“The entire taxing and monetary systems are, hereby, placed under the U.C.C.” The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, also see: Public Law 89-719, Legis. Hist., pg 3722, C.R.S. 5-1-106.   [“The Federal    Tax Lien    Act of 1966, Pub. Law 89-719, Section 101, 80 Stat. 1125 (1966) was adopted in order to conform the lien provisions of the internal revenue laws to the concepts developed in the Uniform Commercial Code.“]NOW, DISCOVER THE MEANING OF “FRAUD.”

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [voyagesoflight@gmail.com] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Operation Disclosure is an independent media platform dedicated to exploring global geopolitics and alternative perspectives. Our mission is to provide a central hub for diverse viewpoints on world events, including independent research into exopolitics, aerial phenomena (UAP), and the historical origins of humanity. We believe in providing a platform for information that encourages deeper inquiry into the world around us.

Disclaimer: The content on Operation Disclosure—including articles, videos, and images—is contributed by our readers or curated for informational and educational interest. Views, opinions, and claims expressed in these posts belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Operation Disclosure. We do not guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of this content; therefore, we encourage all readers to engage with the material with a spirit of personal inquiry and discernment.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure Official