(Reader: Doug Duff) Which “Right” is Most Valuable?

0
457

Reader Post | By Doug Duff

Question: What is our most valued Right? Please, find it in the “Case” contained in the next paragraph.

“The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man’s spiritual nature, of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone – the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.” [Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting); see also Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)]

Now, you know; the most Valuable Right is the Right To Be Let Alone – – the one thing that Gubm’t will never do – UNTIL WE MAKE THEM.
Here’s a couple more points, bluntly put:

Roman General Sulla said, “Stop quoting the law, we have swords.”

Diogenes, 412 BC to 323 BC, said, “The great thieves lead away the little thief.”

Jeremiah 16:19 “…Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.”

Habakkuk 1:4 (KJV) “Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth.”

Matthew 15:6-9 “Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition. Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying, This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me. But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.”

There’s not a dime’s worth of difference in “process and procedure” of 2000 years ago and that of today. The same ideals are extant now, as then. Those that deem themselves to be “in power” care not about True Law; they only care that they are “enforcers” of the presiding political empire, whether it be to the corporate U.S., the Queen of England, the City of London, or her/their superior, the Pope and the Vatican Bank. Examine the “SEAL OF THE GREAT STATE OF _______” and you’ll discover that the Roman Empire is pasted on every phase of government, from the Roman “Numerals” to the emblematic overtones. Even the structure of the Senate and House of Representatives, the Cabinet, and, especially, the “Codes” are all duplicates of the Roman Empire, the same Roman Empire that crucified the Innocent Yahshua.

What is the “Politico” telling us today? It is saying the same thing it said at the time of Christ, “If you can get past my “dogs” you can help yourself to your inheritance.” 

Thomas Jefferson said,  “I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but with tyrants, I will give no quarter, nor waste arguments where they will certainly be lost.”

FURTHER EXPLANATION:

The rights endowed by Creator require no license to posess or use and are not taxed, the rights created by man do. I have an “in depth” discourse available on “licenses.” Shortened discourse follows:

“A permit, granted by an appropriate governmental body, generally for consideration, to a person, firm, or a corporation, to pursue some occupation or to carry on some business which is subject to regulation under the police power.”
Rosenblatt v California State Bd. of Pharmacy, 158 P. 2d 199, 203.

The term “license” implies a divestiture of right or title, by the licensee, to the property which is subject to the “license.” A “license” is a mere revokable “privilege” to do An act (or series of acts) upon land, and excludes the right or Title thereto.
Eastman v Piper, 229 P. 1002, 1003;
Gravelly Ford Canal Co. v Pope and Talbot Land Co., 178 P. 155, 163;
Howes v Barmon, 81 P. 48, 49, Rodefer v Pittsburgh, 74 NE 183, 186.

“A license is in the general nature of a special privilege, entitling the licensee to do something that he would not be entitled to do without the license”.
51 American Jurisprudence 2d., LICENSES AND PERMITS, PART ONE, GENERAL PRINCIPLES, I. GENERAL, §1. Generally, p. 7.

The federal courts of this country have held:

There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of the exercise of a constitutional right.
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945 (9th Cir. 1973), Spevack v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967), GARRITY v. NEW JERSEY, 385 U.S. 493 (1967), BOYD v. U S, 116 U.S. 616 (1886), MALLOY v. HOGAN, 378 U.S. 1 (1964)

Further, I do not consent to be trustee, fiduciary or surety and I refuse all “benefits” of capricious, corporate government.

______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located on the site.
______________________________________________________

Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © 2021 Operation Disclosure