Will the Coronavirus Bioweapon Lead to Nuclear War?


Operation Disclosure | By David Lifschultz, Contributing Writer

Submitted on November 12, 2021


Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899

First we present the video by Dr. David Martin which is an excellent summary of the Corona bioweapon to reduce the population of the earth which includes the man made virus itself and the man made vaccines both of which are bioweapons.  All laboratory tests on animals of the genetic vaccines have led to the deaths of all of the animals which have caused leading experts to denounce the genetic vaccines as a form of premeditated murder. You need only to listen to this brief video to have a complete understanding of this grave situation.


Summary of bioweapon article in the below link:

Will the Coronavirus Bioweapon Lead to Nuclear War? | Operation Disclosure Official


The next link covers the sources of World War One and Two which is germane to the unabridged bioweapon article that follows as the descendants of the same deep state who engineered both world wars are still ruling today. They also stole the election from Trump which is standard operating procedure in the United States as was famously perpetrated by Mayor Daley of Chicago that Joe Kennedy bribed to put his son in as President. Kuhn Loeb’s Morty Schiff, an agent of Baron Eduard de Rothschild, bribed Boss Flynn of the Bronx in 1928 to put Roosevelt in as governor of New York State that they groomed for President just to name a few prominent election rigs which riggings are as common in America as apple pie.  This is not to suggest Europe in the first world is any different, and parallels the corruption in elections in the third world that the first world supervises. The second world of Russia and Eastern Europe no longer are any different since the break up of the Soviet Union though the US rigs their elections too as well as Europe.  It is more accurate to say all three worlds are rigged by what we will call international finance that rule through the central banks which is discussed in the next link. Morty’s father Jacob financed half the Japanese war against Russia in Paris in the office of Baron Eduard de Rothschild in his effort to destroy the Tsar.

We believe as Ray Dalio that the present systems of government face in the near future revolutions as the earmarks are all around us.

Billionaire Hedge-Fund Manager Warns a “Revolution” Is Coming

The US Faces Financial Armegeddon

Fed Enters Debt Trap as Oil Soars


Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899


For murder, though it have no tongue, will speak With most miraculous organ. – Hamlet 

Dr. David Martin in his report below regards the genetic vaccines as a depopulation bioweapon. He is an expert in the area of patented medicines and found the so-called coronavirus patented in 2003. This means that this was not a natural virus outbreak but according to Dr. Martin it was the launch of a bioweapon which is the opinion of Chinese intel and Russian intel. This could lead to war at some point and sources believe that these charges have not officially been made by Russia and China to avoid war as it could lead to mass war hysteria in their countries.  In order to cover it up, they say that this was an involuntary release but Ron Unz is quoted in China as saying otherwise in the next link. Then, the link after this is Ron Unz’s article where he writes that the evidence is that this was a purposeful attack on China by the US which ricocheted back on the US.

Xinhua News Agency or New China News Agency is the official state-run press agency of the People’s Republic of China. Xinhua is the biggest and most influential media organization in China, as well as the largest news agency in the world in terms of worldwide correspondents.

Here is the Ron Unz article charging that this was an American bioweapon attack on China:

American Pravda: Our Coronavirus Catastrophe as Biowarfare Blowback?

Here are more current articles by Ron Unz stating the coronavirus was a biological warfare attack on China by the US.

I see these reports coming from China as severe warnings by their publishing Ron Unz’s works. We have not similarly received these warnings from Russia as Russia is under the control of Lord Jacob Rothschild through the oligarchs except for charges from Sergei Glaziev who is a dark horse candidate to succeed Vladimir Putin who is Rothschild’s agent through Roman Abramovitch. It goes without saying the traitorous oligarchs who have stolen half the wealth of Russia for Lord Jacob Rothschild would oppose Glaziev. The question is what the FSB, SVR, etc. and military will do.



RAS Academician Sergei Glazyev said that the only country in which the coronavirus could be “invented” could only be the United States. He made such a conclusion on the grounds that only this state refused to sign an international treaty on monitoring compliance with the convention on the prohibition of biological weapons.

According to the academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, several factors speak of the man-made origin of COVID-19. First, Glazyev refers to a publication on the synthesis of a coronavirus capable of infecting people in a reputable scientific journal for 2015. The study was authored by biologists from the United States, Canada and China. Secondly, there is evidence of a patent for this invention, which was announced by the American political scientist David Lifschultz. Thirdly, there is information about the relocation of a Chinese woman scientist who worked in an American-English laboratory that synthesized the coronavirus. She moved from America to China a few months before the Wuhan epidemic. Finally, there is also unverified information that this laboratory belonged to a private Anglo-American foundation. Sergey Glazyev  stated this in his Telegram channel.

Glazyev is confident that the synthesis of the virus clearly speaks of the development of biological weapons, which is prohibited by an international convention. The RAS academician is sure that in this case it is necessary to conduct an investigation and establish an international tribunal against the perpetrators. At the same time, according to Glazyev, apart from the United States, such a virus could not have been synthesized anywhere else. The point is not only in the availability of qualified personnel, but also in the fact that only the United States remains “the only scientific and technological power” that refuses to sign an international treaty on monitoring compliance with the biological weapons convention. “As the saying goes, the hat is on fire on the thief,” said Sergei Glazyev.

The synthesis of coronavirus was carried out in the United States by order of the world financial oligarchy 33

08/05/2021 13:25 SERGEY GLAZYEV8122 9.6 (82)  

The evidence collected by the American parliamentarian about the artificial origin of the coronavirus should be supplemented with the following facts: publication on the synthesis of the coronavirus, which can infect people in 2015, in an authoritative scientific journal, sponsored by a team of scientists from the USA, Canada, England and China; data on the patent for the invention of the coronavirus, which David Lifschultz writes about with reference to an interview with Dr. Martin; information about the relocation of a Chinese scientist who worked in an American-English laboratory that synthesized coronavirus from America to China a few months before the epidemic in Wuhan; unverified information that the laboratory in Wuhan belonged to a private Anglo-American foundation.  A lot of information that the synthesis of coronavirus was carried out in the United States by order of the global financial oligarchy that controls the health insurance system is contained in Lifschultz’s publications with a large number of references to primary sources. In any case, the synthesis of this virus in fact means the development of biological weapons prohibited by an international convention.

Future prospects

Alongside Sergey Lavrov and Dmitry Medvedev, Glazyev is often spoken about as a potential successor of Putin. “In view of the difficult economic situation in the country, the assumption that Glazyev will take perhaps the central position in government is heard more and more often.”

Vtoroy, Mark (September 15, 2015). “Who’s next? Three possible successors to Putin (an article that first appeared in Politrussia, translated by J. Arnoldski)”.

This could easily create a world war where a billion people die.


The following article demonstrates the lethal nature of the genetic vaccine.

Emergency Rooms across America being swamped by post-vaccine patients suffering organ failure

Current estimates show that people who have taken mRNA-based covid vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer) lose about 5 percent of their innate immune function each week. After about 20 weeks, they are characterized as “AIDS patients” who have little to no functioning immunity against in-the-wild pathogens such as common colds and flu viruses.

Beyond merely theoretical, this phenomenon is now being confirmed by the swamping of US hospital emergency rooms with post-vaccine patients who are exhibiting extreme levels of sickness against common health insults. “ERs are now swamped with seriously ill patients — but many don’t even have COVID,” reported yesterday.

“Months of treatment delays have exacerbated chronic conditions and worsened symptoms. Doctors and nurses say the severity of illness ranges widely and includes abdominal pain, respiratory problems, blood clots, heart conditions and suicide attempts, among others.”

The upshot is that emergency rooms are being overrun with vaccine injured patients… and it’s not even November yet. Imagine what the scene looks like in mid-January.

Get the full story in today’s feature podcast here.


Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899



The panic introduction of patented vaccines is an error by any standard of modern medicine. You have to test vaccines before rollouts at least five to ten years to determine the death rate. In three years of testing it could be the Black Plague or it may not be.  One year of testing or less for boosters means nothing. That is the real issue from the modern vaccine standpoint. It should not be rolled out except after exhaustive testing even by modern medicine’s own standards. Even then there are errors in judgement as the massive rise in autism is linked by many authorities to the other so-called safe vaccines that went through ten years of tests. Then, there is the question whether the vaccines based on the germ or virus theory is true, which if were not true, then the very concept of the vaccine as a preventive agent is false.

For example, the Polio Vaccine came in to prevent polio with the usual propaganda about antibodies, etc. yet the elimination of Polio has been connected to the discontinuation of the use of DDT on crops to destroy insects. If that is so, then the charges that the Polio vaccine has caused polio rather than cured has credence.  

This issue on vaccines is not new. All England in the 19th century was being forced to vaccinate using Jenner’s cowpox vaccine opposed by Count Leo Tolstoy and George Bernard Shaw who called it a dirty form of witchcraft.

Here the evil spirit was converted into a germ or virus to use scientific garb. Jenner said that all of mankind would die if they did not use his cowpox inoculation which sounds familiar today, and Shaw said that it was a question of sanitation which is the meaning behind Deuteronomy 23:13 sanitary regulations. As people began to congregate in the cities they started to live amidst pollution not found on farms. For example, horse droppings were not cleaned up on the streets and coal was used as fuel that poisoned the air. Also the rivers were a source of plague being polluted with human and animal excrement. It was the hygiene movement that ended small pox and not vaccinations. You find today that the vaccinated are more likely to develop the so-called coronavirus than the unvaccinated.  That has been explained by describing the patented coronavirus in 2003 and the patented vaccines as bioweapons by Dr. David Martin.  Here is an introduction to his work next.

The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier

This document is prepared for humanity by Dr. David E. Martin.

Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899

This work was supported, in part, by a fund-raising effort in which approximately 330 persons contributed funds in support of the New Earth technology team and Urban Global Health Alliance. It is released under a Creative Commons license CCBY-NC-SA. Any derivative use of this dossier must be made public for the benefit of others. All documents, references and

disclosures contained herein are subject to an AS-IS representation. The author does not bear responsibility for errors in the public record or references therein. Throughout this document, uses of terms commonly accepted in medical and scientific literature do not imply acceptance or rejection of the dogma that they represent.



Over the past two decades, my company – M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC). In our 2003-2004 Global Technology Assessment: Vector Weaponization M·CAM highlighted China’s growing involvement in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology with respect to joining the world stage in chimeric construction of viral vectors. Since that time, on a weekly basis, we have monitored the development of research and commercial efforts in this field, including, but not limited to, the research synergies forming between the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),the National Institutes for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), Harvard University, Emory University, Vanderbilt University, Tsinghua University, University of Pennsylvania, many other research institutions, and their commercial affiliations.

The National Institute of Health’s grant AI23946-08 issued to Dr. Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (officially classified as affiliated with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID by at least 2003) began the work on synthetically altering the Coronaviridae (the coronavirus family) for the express purpose of general research, pathogenic enhancement, detection, manipulation, and potential therapeutic interventions targeting the same. As early as May 21, 2000, Dr. Baric and UNC sought to patent critical sections of the coronavirus family for their commercial benefit.1 In one of the several papers derived from work sponsored by this grant, Dr. Baric published what he reported to be the full length cDNA of SARS CoV in which it was clearly stated that SAR CoV was based on a composite of DNA segments.

“Using a panel of contiguous cDNAs that span the entire genome, we have assembled a full-length cDNA of the SARS-CoV Urbani strain, and have rescued molecularly cloned SARS viruses (infectious clone SARS-CoV) that contained the expected marker mutations inserted into the component clones.”2

On April 19, 2002 – the Spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus. In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.” This work was supported by the NIH grant referenced above and GM63228. In short, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.

1 U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,537, filed May 21, 2000

Against this backdrop, we noted the unusual patent prosecution efforts of the CDC, when on April 25, 2003 they sought to patent the SARS coronavirus isolated from humans that had reportedly transferred to humans during the 2002-2003 SARS outbreak in Asia. 35 U.S.C. §101 prohibits patenting nature. This legality did not deter CDC in their efforts. Their application, updated in 2007, ultimately issued as U.S. Patent 7,220,852 and constrained anyone not licensed by their patent from manipulating SARS CoV, developing tests or kits to measure SARS coronavirus in humans or working with their patented virus for therapeutic use. Work associated with this virus by their select collaborators included considerable amounts of chimeric engineering, gain-of-function studies, viral characterization, detection, treatment (both vaccine and therapeutic intervention), and weaponization inquiries.

In short, with Baric’s U.S. Patent 6,593,111 (Claims 1 and 5) and CDC’s ‘852 patent (Claim 1), no research in the United States could be conducted without permission or infringement.

We noted that gain-of-function specialist, Dr. Ralph Baric, was both the recipient of millions of dollars of U.S. research grants from several federal agencies but also sat on the World Health Organization’s International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and the Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG). In this capacity, he was both responsible for determining “novelty” of clades of virus species but directly benefitted from determining declarations of novelty in the form of new research funding authorizations and associated patenting and commercial collaboration. Together with CDC, NIAID, WHO, academic and commercial parties (including Johnson & Johnson; Sanofi and their several coronavirus patent holding biotech companies; Moderna; Ridgeback; Gilead; Sherlock Biosciences; and, others), a powerful group of interests constituted what we would suggest are “interlocking directorates” under U.S. anti-trust laws.

These entities also were affiliated with the WHO’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) whose members were instrumental in the Open Philanthropy-funded global coronavirus pandemic “desk-top” exercise EVENT 201 in October 2019. This event, funded by the principal investor in Sherlock Biosciences and linking interlocking funding partner, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation into the GPMB mandate for a respiratory disease global preparedness exercise to be completed by September 2020 alerted us to anticipate an “epidemic” scenario. We expected to see such a scenario


emerge from Wuhan or Guangdong China, northern Italy, Seattle, New York or a combination thereof, as Dr. Zhengli Shi and Dr. Baric’s work on zoonotic transmission of coronavirus identified overlapping mutations in coronavirus in bat populations located in these areas.

This dossier is by no means exhaustive. It is, however, indicative the numerous criminal violations that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism. All source materials are referenced herein. An additional detailed breakdown of all the of individuals, research institutions, foundations, funding sources, and commercial enterprises can be accessed upon request.

Click here to download the Document in its entirety

David Lifschultz


Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [] and we’ll forward your email to the author.


Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [] applying these following rules.


The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top



If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located on the site.


Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to get you up-to-date on the latest conspiracies and to provide raw unvetted information from various sources. We are also focused on disclosing extraterrestrial contact and humanity’s lost ancient origins.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © 2022 Operation Disclosure