The SCIF: How US Taxpayer Dollars Fuel the Global Election Fraud Cartel

The SCIF
@TheIntelSCIF

The Global Election Fraud Cartel and how U.S. taxpayer dollars, A-WEB, and USAID, fuel and manage a global web of election fraud, with lies, manipulation, and election equipment technology.

In a world where democracy is hailed as the ultimate beacon of freedom, a shadowy alliance of international organizations and tech firms is accused of turning ballots into battlegrounds. (High quality link to documents in video at bottom of post).

At the center of this storm? The Association of World Election Bodies (A-WEB), a South Korean-led entity bankrolled by American taxpayers through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), alongside controversial players like Miru Systems, Smartmatic, and Dominion Voting Systems.

What started as a noble quest to “export democracy” to developing nations has devolved into a whirlwind of fraud allegations, bloody riots, and overturned results across continents.

Buckle up, this isn’t just about rigged votes, it’s about your hard-earned dollars propping up a system that critics say is eroding trust in elections worldwide, including right here in the U.S. and over 100+ countries worldwide.

The birth of A-WEB, a Korean export with American funding. Founded in 2013 under the auspices of South Korea’s National Election Commission (NEC), A-WEB bills itself as the world’s largest network for sharing election know-how. With over 100 member countries, it promotes “best practices” through training, tech exports, and free central servers for electronic voting systems. Sounds altruistic?

A-WEB’s operations are fully funded by the NEC, which in turn receives U.S. support via USAID. In 2014, A-WEB inked Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with USAID and other U.S.-backed groups like the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), Democracy International (DI), the National Democratic Institute (NDI), and the International Republican Institute (IRI).

These pacts focus on capacity building, election law reforms, and tech dissemination in emerging democracies— all subsidized by American foreign aid, which totals billions annually.

But here’s the catch, critics allege A-WEB isn’t just sharing expertise, it’s exporting vulnerability. Using Official Development Assistance (ODA) funds, A-WEB has installed central servers and facilitated electronic voting machine deals in nations like Fiji, Argentina, El Salvador, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Ecuador, Romania, Dominica, Kyrgyzstan, Iraq, Bolivia, South Africa, and Belarus.

In nearly every case, scandals erupted. A-WEB’s first Secretary-General, Kim Yong-hee, faced a 2018 probe by South Korean prosecutors over cash bribes from Miru Systems, a key supplier. Though cleared, the NEC slashed A-WEB’s budget amid the fallout, highlighting a rift fueled by persistent suspicions of collusion.

USAID’s role? As a major funder of global democracy programs, it pours taxpayer money into these initiatives under the guise of advancing “free and fair elections.” Yet, recent scrutiny reveals USAID’s broader controversies.

From accusations of interfering in foreign politics to “brainwashing” recipients through aid strings, critics like the Global Times argue it’s a tool for U.S. hegemony. In Trump’s second term, cuts to USAID have sparked debates about militarizing aid or withdrawing from international bodies, but the election tech pipeline persists.

Miru Systems. The “Cheating Machines” at the heart of global chaos. Enter Miru Systems, a South Korean firm with a mere handful of years in the game, yet it’s become A-WEB’s go-to for electronic voting tech.

Allegations paint Miru as the villain in a string of electoral disasters. Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi fired commission members on corruption charges, with fingers pointed at collusion between Iraqi officials and Miru.

Iraq (2018), Miru snagged an exclusive $150 million contract via A-WEB’s push, supplying machines for the parliamentary elections. Chaos ensued. Explosions at ballot storage sites, fraud claims, and a manual recount flipped winners.

The media exposed how Iraq’s election commission ignored warnings about the machines’ vulnerabilities to hacking and manipulation. An opposition leader even flew to Seoul to protest.

Democratic Republic of Congo (2018), A-WEB brokered a $160 million deal for 107,000 Miru touchscreen units. Western nations, including the U.S., warned of fraud risks under President Joseph Kabila. Post-election riots k****d dozens as locals dubbed them “cheating machines.”

The South Korean government distanced itself, but protests spilled to Miru’s headquarters. Kyrgyzstan (2020), A-WEB-provided servers fueled protests over rigged results favoring President Sooronbay Jeenbekov’s allies.

The Central Election Commission annulled the vote amid corruption claims tied to Miru’s tech. Critics argue these systems, prone to hacking, with QR code readers and wireless laptops, are blueprints for manipulation, mirroring South Korea’s own 2020 controversies.

Miru’s woes extend to the Philippines, where it’s bidding on 2025 elections despite fraud tags from Congo and Iraq.

Smartmatic and Dominion, the U.S. connection, and a regime change global operation. While A-WEB and Miru dominate the export narrative, U.S.-linked firms Smartmatic and Dominion add fuel to the fire.

Smartmatic, a Venezuelan-founded giant with operations in London, the Philippines, and Taiwan, showcased its touchscreen machines at a 2014 A-WEB event in Seoul, attended by USAID partners. It boasts success in the Philippines and Venezuela but faces bribery scandals. In 2023, executives were indicted for a $1 million scheme to rig Philippine contracts.

A fugitive exec even pushed Smartmatic tech in Texas. Dominion, a Canadian-U.S. firm with servers in Serbia and Germany, licensed software from Smartmatic (leading to a 2012 lawsuit).

Owned by Staple Street Capital (with ties to UBS Securities and Chinese board members), it’s been dogged by 2020 U.S. fraud claims, “debunked” in court but amplified in defamation suits against media like Fox News, settling for $787 million, that is now looking like this ruling could be reversed or a new lawsuit could be in the works, especially with multiple states now confirming new evidence that is brewing behind closed doors.

Direct A-WEB links are pushed aside, as USAID was in America, but whistleblowers allege global cartels involving CCP influence, with USAID’s democracy funds indirectly enabling tech proliferation. The proof is in the results and outcomes of these countries elections, and one thing is for sure.

Someone is funding these operations to steal elections worldwide and A-WEB and USAID are in the line of sight. Other players? IFES, NDI, IRI, and the Asia Foundation, all USAID collaborators, focus on “capacity building,” but critics see them as vectors for influence, echoing U.S. laws banning foreign meddling in domestic elections.

The taxpayer trap. Funding fraud or fostering freedom? As Trump-era cuts loom, voices demand accountability. Trump recently announced on the world stage in Davos that prosecutions are coming soon for the stolen 2020 elections.

Former lawmaker Min Kyung-wook’s push for a UN team echoes global calls. The verdict? Without transparency, the ballot box remains a black box, rigged and sold out to the highest bidder, your dollars are in play

Time for a recount on foreign aid? U.S. foreign aid, exceeding $50 billion yearly, includes election support to counter rivals like China and Russia. Yet, allegations persist. A-WEB’s ties to Miru mirror broader concerns about unverified tech in poor nations, sparking riots and eroding trust. In South Korea’s 2020 election, similar systems faced fraud claims, with calls for international probes.

Whistleblowers link it to a “global cartel” pushing communism, funded by USAID, shady NGOs with a front for “freedom and diversity,” the Democrat Party, and globalists using YOUR U.S. taxpayer dollars to steal elections and install communist regimes all around the world.

It’s time to expose the ones behind it all and the programs disguised funding it. We will NOT go along with this any longer. The time for change is now.

Link to PDF of all documents in video (high quality):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nMP6-a5FhDy-vHcmoXkQYMWhcEWybi-M/view?usp=sharing

The Global Election Fraud Cartel and how U.S. taxpayer dollars, A-WEB, and USAID, fuel and manage a global web of election fraud, with lies, manipulation, and election equipment technology.

In a world where democracy is hailed as the ultimate beacon of freedom, a shadowy… pic.twitter.com/vcODzfYWlS

— The SCIF (@TheSCIF) January 24, 2026

Source(s):
https://x.com/TheSCIF/status/2014981542330667277

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [voyagesoflight@gmail.com] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to get you up-to-date on the latest conspiracies and geopolitics. We also aim to provide raw unvetted information about world events from various sources and user submitted research on topics such as exopolitics, extraterrestrial and UFO/UAP sightings, secret space programs, and the lost or ancient origins and history of humanity.

Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views, and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure