Advertisement
______________________________________________________

(Reader: Doug Duff) Regarding Sovereignty

0
1868
Advertisement

______________________________________________________

Reader Post | By Doug Duff

SOVEREIGNTY in a Nutshell

Most “instructors” attempt to teach you WHAT to think, or what you “should” think. They should be teaching you “HOW” to think objectively. The Subject of this topic is Sovereignty and NOT what you’ve been taught.

Few people know the True Meaning of “SOVEREIGN.” Let’s break this word down etymologically.

Begin with “so.” So means “In This Manner.” Next, go on to “ver,” which means “Truthfully,” as in “Verily, verily, I say unto you.” Finally, look at “reign,” which means “To Rule.” Add them all together by their meaning – In This Manner Truth Rules.”

That is the true Definition of Sovereignty, dear friends.

The Author of any article, declaration, or other writ has the Power to DEFINE. This “authority” should/must be the first position of instruction on any document, commonly called, “Definitions.”

My “Pen” name is “Funky Pretzel” – one of about a dozen such names I have written under. That’s no big deal. You need to know the “Message,” not the Messenger.

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

Funky Pretzel

Below is a few examples that may be of interest to you. (I have eleven pages of such examples, thus, only a few.)

Sovereign Citizen cannot be punished for sincerely held religious convictions, such as the belief that he is in fact born free and at liberty to act as such. (Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991).

A sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends. Kawananakoa v Polyblank 205 U.S. 349, 353 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907).

sovereign is not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N. Y. 535, 11 Am. Rep. 751; U.S. v. Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 24 L. Ed. 192.

A waiver of sovereign immunity “cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.” King, 395 U.S. At 4.

“All jurisdiction is founded on consent; either the consent of all the citizens, implied in the social compact itself, or the express consent of the party or his sovereign.” UNITED STATES V. BEVANS U.S. Supreme Court·16 U.S. 336 (1818).

______________________________________________________

Advertisement

______________________________________________________

“All that government does and provides legitimately is in pursuit of its duty to provide protection for private tights (Wynehamer v. People, 13 NY 378). which duty is a debt owed to its creator, WE THE PEOPLE and the private unenfranchised individual; which debt and duty is never extinguished nor discharged, and is perpetual. No matter what the government/state provides for us in manner of convenience and safety, the unenfranchised individual owes nothing to the government. “Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43- U.S. Supreme Court: Hale, 201 U.S. 43 (1906). Allegiance applies to subjects not sovereignty. Talbat v. Janson. 3 US (3 Dall) 133.

Americans are sovereigns without being a subjects we are equal. Chisholm supra LEd at 472.ONE FINAL NOTE: Many times I have quoted “cases” that no one seems to be able to find. When you are researching, remember, there is a vast difference between DCUS and USDC (District Court of the United States and United States District Court); also, the Supreme Court of the United States versus United States Supreme Court.

______________________________________________________

Contact Author

If you wish to contact the author of this article. Please email us at [voyagesoflight@gmail.com]. Availability of author’s contact information depends on if said article was user submitted or reposted.
______________________________________________________

Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to [voyagesoflight@gmail.com] applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: “Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure”

– Must be in text format
– Proper Grammar
– No foul language
– Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________

Newsletter

If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe via the PayPal “Subscribe” button located at the bottom.
______________________________________________________

Operation Disclosure is an independent media platform dedicated to exploring global geopolitics and alternative perspectives. Our mission is to provide a central hub for diverse viewpoints on world events, including independent research into exopolitics, aerial phenomena (UAP), and the historical origins of humanity. We believe in providing a platform for information that encourages deeper inquiry into the world around us.

Disclaimer: The content on Operation Disclosure—including articles, videos, and images—is contributed by our readers or curated for informational and educational interest. Views, opinions, and claims expressed in these posts belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Operation Disclosure. We do not guarantee the absolute accuracy or completeness of this content; therefore, we encourage all readers to engage with the material with a spirit of personal inquiry and discernment.

Copyright © Operation Disclosure Official

Advertisement